Comparison of 3 T MRI and CT for the measurement of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in humans

被引:138
作者
Klopfenstein, B. J. [1 ]
Kim, M. S. [1 ]
Krisky, C. M. [1 ,2 ]
Szumowski, J. [3 ]
Rooney, W. D. [2 ]
Purnell, J. Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Endocrinol Diabet & Clin Nutr, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Adv Imaging Res Ctr, Portland, OR USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Radiol, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ABDOMINAL FAT; RISK;
D O I
10.1259/bjr/57987644
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Objective: CT is considered the gold standard imaging modality for measurement of visceral adipose tissue area. However, as CT imaging exposes subjects to ionising radiation, a comparable imaging technique without this exposure is desirable, such as MRI. Therefore, we compared the agreement of measures of visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneous adipose tissue area from single-slice images obtained at the umbilicus using a 3 T MRI scanner with single-slice images obtained via CT scan. Methods: 64 images were obtained from 27 subjects who underwent MRI and CT scanning on the same day, after 10-12 hours of fasting. Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue depots were manually separated and quantified using a multimodality image-processing software program. Results: We found good agreement between CT and MRI for the measurement of both visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneous adipose tissue. Bland-Altman difference analysis demonstrated a mean bias of -2.9% (as a portion of total abdominal area) for visceral adipose tissue and +0.4% for subcutaneous adipose tissue, as measured by MRI compared with CT. Conclusion: MRI is a safe, accurate and precise imaging modality for measuring both visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue, making it a favourable alternative to CT for quantification of these adipose depots.
引用
收藏
页码:E826 / E830
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
ABATE N, 1994, J LIPID RES, V35, P1490
[2]
Abdominal MR Imaging at 3.0 T [J].
Akisik, Fatih M. ;
Sandrasegaran, Kumaresan ;
Aisen, Alex M. ;
Lin, Chen ;
Lall, Chandana .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 (05) :1433-1444
[3]
Billington CJ, 2000, ARCH INTERN MED, V160, P898, DOI 10.1001/archinte.160.7.898
[4]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]
ASSESSMENT OF ABDOMINAL FAT-CONTENT BY COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
BORKAN, GA ;
GERZOF, SG ;
ROBBINS, AH ;
HULTS, DE ;
SILBERT, CK ;
SILBERT, JE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1982, 36 (01) :172-177
[6]
Intra-abdominal fat is a major determinant of the national cholesterol education program adult treatment panel III criteria for the metabolic syndrome [J].
Carr, DB ;
Utzschneider, KM ;
Hull, RL ;
Kodama, K ;
Retzlaff, BM ;
Brunzell, JD ;
Shofer, JB ;
Fish, BE ;
Knopp, RH ;
Kahn, SE .
DIABETES, 2004, 53 (08) :2087-2094
[7]
The metabolic syndrome [J].
Eckel, RH ;
Grundy, SM ;
Zimmet, PZ .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9468) :1415-1428
[8]
Visceral adiposity and incident coronary heart disease in Japanese-American men - The 10-year follow-up results of the Seattle Japanese-American Community Diabetes Study [J].
Fujimoto, WY ;
Bergstrom, RW ;
Boyko, EJ ;
Chen, KW ;
Leonetti, DL ;
Newell-Morris, L ;
Shofer, JB ;
Wahl, PW .
DIABETES CARE, 1999, 22 (11) :1808-1812
[9]
Gomi Tatsuya, 2005, Radiat Med, V23, P584
[10]
Whole-body adipose tissue analysis: comparison of MRI, CT and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry [J].
Kullberg, J. ;
Brandberg, J. ;
Angelhed, J-E ;
Frimmel, H. ;
Bergelin, E. ;
Strid, L. ;
Ahlstroem, H. ;
Johansson, L. ;
Loenn, L. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 82 (974) :123-130