Genetic structure of island populations of the anurans Rana temporaria and Bufo bufo

被引:66
作者
Seppä, P
Laurila, A
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Biosci, Div Genet, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Systemat & Ecol, Div Populat Biol, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
anurans; Bufo; gene flow; isolation by distance; population size; Rana;
D O I
10.1038/sj.hdy.6884900
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Amphibians have traditionally been considered to have low dispersal ability and they have become a model for studies on the effects of man-made habitat fragmentation on genetic variation and population differentiation. This study examined the genetic population structure in the common frog (Rann temporaria) and the common toad (Bufo bufo) in an archipelago of the northern Baltic Sea. Heterozygosity was not correlated with distance of the island from the mainland nor, in R. temporaria, with effective population size based on census estimates. Generally, no inbreeding was detected in island populations. The overall differentiation among islands was weak, but the F-ST values were significantly larger in R. temporaria (F-ST = 0.068) than in B. bufo (F-ST = 0.019). Most of the differentiation was a result of differences among groups of islands, differentiation within them playing a minor role. Thus, assuming Wright's island model of migration, gene flow was rather high among closely located islands, but longer distances seemed to form a slight dispersal barrier for R. temporaria. Strong gene flow within the study area was confirmed by lack of isolation by distance. The estimated effective population sizes in R. temporaria were small, the average being 32 breeding females per island. The results indicate that gene flow between island populations across the matrix of open, brackish-water sea is extensive and suggest that the anurans are well able to disperse in this natural metapopulation system.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 317
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, SCHRIFTENREIHE LANDS
[2]  
Avise John C., 1994, pi
[3]  
Beebee T.J.C., 1996, ECOLOGY CONSERVATION
[4]   AMPHIBIAN DECLINES - JUDGING STABILITY, PERSISTENCE, AND SUSCEPTIBILITY OF POPULATIONS TO LOCAL AND GLOBAL EXTINCTIONS [J].
BLAUSTEIN, AR ;
WAKE, DB ;
SOUSA, WP .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1994, 8 (01) :60-71
[5]  
COCKERHAM CC, 1969, EVOLUTION, V23, P72, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1969.tb03496.x
[6]  
COCKERHAM CC, 1973, GENETICS, V74, P679
[7]  
DOLE JW, 1971, COPEIA, P221
[8]  
Duellman D.E, 1986, BIOL AMPHIBIANS
[9]  
Gasc J.-P., 1997, ATLAS AMPHIBIANS REP
[10]   Genetic differentiation in Silene dioica metapopulations: Estimation of spatiotemporal effects in a successional plant species [J].
Giles, BE ;
Goudet, J .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1997, 149 (03) :507-526