Estimation of Renal Function - What is Appropriate in Cancer Patients?

被引：31

作者：

Barraclough, L. H. ^{[1
]}

Field, C. ^{[2
]}

Wieringa, G. ^{[2
]}

Swindell, R. ^{[3
]}

Livsey, J. E. ^{[1
]}

Davidson, S. E. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Christie Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol, Manchester, Lancs, England

[2] Christie Hosp, Dept Biochem, Manchester, Lancs, England

[3] Christie Hosp, Dept Med Stat, Manchester, Lancs, England

来源：

CLINICAL ONCOLOGY | 2008年 / 20卷 / 10期

关键词：

Cancer; estimated GFR; glomerular filtration; radioisotope GFR; renal function assessment;

D O I：

10.1016/j.clon.2008.09.004

中图分类号：

R73 [肿瘤学];

学科分类号：

100214 [肿瘤学];

摘要：

Aims: To compare the accuracy of renal assessment in patients with cancer using radioisotope glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urine collection for creatinine clearance, Cockroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Wright formulae. Materials and methods: Measurements of isotope GFR from 367 patients were compared with estimates from the described methods (Cockroft-Gault, MDRD, Wright). An analysis including a further 252 patients with an isotope GFR <= 50 ml/min was also carried out. Results: The Wright formula was the most accurate form of estimating renal function for the first study group. The formulae were similar in accuracy in the second study group. Conclusions: The Wright formula is the most accurate form of estimation of renal function in comparison with the isotope GFR for cancer patients. When there is a large proportion of patients with a low isotope GFR (<= 50 ml/min), the formulae have similar accuracy. Barraclough, L. H. et al. (2008). Clinical Oncology 20, 721-726 (c) 2008 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：721 / 726

页数：6

共 24 条

[1]

Cystatin C -: A marker for assessment of the glomerular filtration rate in patients with cisplatin chemotherapy [J].

Benoehr, P. ;

Grenz, A. ;

Hartmann, J. T. ;

Mueller, G. A. ;

Blaschke, S. .

KIDNEY & BLOOD PRESSURE RESEARCH, 2006, 29 (01) :32-35

[2]

Estimation of the glomerular filtration rate through different methods in kidney transplant recipients:: Correlation with the creatinine clearance measurement [J].

Buchler, M. ;

Bretagnol, A. ;

Desaldeleer, C. ;

Garreau, P. ;

Halimi, J. -M. ;

Al-Najjar, A. ;

Marliere, J. -F. ;

Nivet, H. ;

Lebranchu, Y. .

TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (07) :2289-2291

[3]

Calvert AH, 1997, SEMIN ONCOL, V24, pS85

[4]

PREDICTION OF CREATININE CLEARANCE FROM SERUM CREATININE [J].

COCKCROFT, DW ;

GAULT, MH .

NEPHRON, 1976, 16 (01) :31-41

[5]

Evaluation of predictive formulae for glomerular filtration rate for carboplatin dosing in gynecological malignancies [J].

de Lemos, Mario L. ;

Hsieh, Teresa ;

Hamata, Linda ;

Levin, Adeera ;

Swenerton, Ken ;

Djurdjev, Ognjenka ;

Vu, Thanh ;

Hu, Francis ;

Conklin, James ;

Taylor, Suzanne C. Malfair .

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 103 (03) :1063-1069

[6]

*DEP HLTH, 2006, EST GLOM FILTR RAT I

[7]

QUANTITATION OF RENAL-FUNCTION WITH GLOMERULAR AND TUBULAR AGENTS [J].

DUBOVSKY, EV ;

RUSSELL, CD .

SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1982, 12 (04) :308-329

[8]

TIME TO SCRAP CREATININE CLEARANCE [J].

GABRIEL, R .

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 293 (6555) :1119-1120

[9]

Formula estimation of glomerular filtration rate: have we gone wrong? [J].

Giles, Paul D. ;

Fitzmaurice, David A. .

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7605) :1198-1200

[10]

Monitoring of renal function in cancer patients:: an ongoing challenge for clinical practice [J].

Kleber, M. ;

Cybulla, M. ;

Bauchmueller, K. ;

Ihorst, G. ;

Koch, B. ;

Engelhardt, M. .

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 (05) :950-958

← 1 2 3 →