Differences in knowledge production between disciplines based on analysis of paper styles and citation patterns

被引:18
作者
Hayashi, T [1 ]
Fujigaki, Y
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Arts & Sci, Dept Gen Syst Studies, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Sci & Technol Agcy, Natl Inst Sci & Technol Policy, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF02766296
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
To identify the differences in the knowledge production between disciplines, we analyzed the. relation between the average paper length and impact factor of 100 journals from 5 disciplines. We found negative correlation between the average length and the impact factor in the natural sciences, but not in the social sciences. We also analyzed the structures of paper and the citation patterns. These analyses are expanded to the comparison between Mode 1 and Mode 2. All results showed the natural sciences articles could emphasize the differences from previous studies and be diffused effectively by the short standardized style of paper.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 86
页数:14
相关论文
共 20 条
[2]   Publication types, citation rates and evaluation [J].
Bourke, P ;
Butler, L .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1996, 37 (03) :473-494
[3]   USING THE ARCHIVE - PRICE,DEREK THEORY OF DIFFERENCES AMONG THE SCIENCES [J].
COZZENS, SE .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1985, 7 (3-6) :431-441
[5]   MEASURING RESEARCH PERFORMANCE IN THE HUMANITIES [J].
FINKENSTAEDT, T .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1990, 19 (5-6) :409-417
[6]   Filling the gap between discussions on science and scientists' everyday activities: applying the autopoiesis system theory to scientific knowledge [J].
Fujigaki, Y .
SOCIAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SUR LES SCIENCES SOCIALES, 1998, 37 (01) :5-22
[7]  
GIBBONS M, 1994, NEW PRODUDCTION KNOW
[8]  
Hemlin S., 1996, Research Evaluation, V6, P53, DOI [10.1093/rev/6.1.53, DOI 10.1093/REV/6.1.53]
[9]  
KOSTOFF RN, 1994, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V45, P428, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199407)45:6<428::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-S