Accuracy and durability of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: What is the useful service life?

被引:28
作者
Lavery, Lawrence A. [1 ]
Lavery, David E. [2 ]
Lavery, David C. [3 ]
LaFontaine, Javier [4 ]
Bharara, Manish [5 ]
Najafi, Bijan [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Plast Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Sci Applicat Int Corp, Mclean, VA 22102 USA
[4] Texas A&M Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Med, Temple, TX USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Surg, SALSA, Tucson, AZ USA
[6] Rosalind Franklin Univ Med & Sci, CLEAR, N Chicago, IL USA
关键词
Diabetic foot; Neuropathy; Prevention; Wound healing; Amputation prevention; DIABETIC FOOT; RISK-FACTORS; ULCERATION; REDUCE; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.diabres.2012.04.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and effective service life of commercially available Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments with repetitive loading. Methods: We obtained 6 brands of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments (SWM) from commercial vendors identified from the Internet and the federal registry. Five monofilaments of each brand were subjected to repeat loading cycles, allowed to rest over night and loaded again the next day. First, sets of five monofilaments were loaded 25 times for each of five days. Then sets of five monofilaments were subjected to 200 loading cycles a day for 15 days. A testing jig ensured each SWM was loaded perpendicular to a digital pressure plate. The buckling force was measured via the pressure plate to determine failure loads. Several statistical techniques were used to examine the behavior of the monofilaments over repeated loadings: time series analysis, ANOVA and nonparametric comparisons of load distributions. Results: The monofilaments tested were neither precise nor accurate. The plasticity of filaments increased with repeated loadings resulting in lower bending forces. Individual and average bending forces varied widely both within and between monofilament brands. All monofilaments showed a typical material failure pattern. Initially the bending force was high but rapidly decreased and then leveled out at levels 1-2 g lower than the starting values. After resting over night, the initial bending force was again high but usually not as high as the previous day and bending forces decreased and then leveled out. Most monofilaments did not start at the accepted 10-g buckling force but varied by up to 30% (p < 0.01). At best, monofilaments starting at the accepted 10 +/- 1 g buckling force would remain within a usable range (9-11 g) for 7-9 days or to evaluate 70-90 patients. Conclusion: Commercially available SWM have significant variability within and between devices from different manufacturers. Their actual bending force varies widely from their designated 10 g value. When used they have a short service life where the instrument is within 10% of their initial bending force which is not usually the stated 10 g of force. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 404
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
The North-West Diabetes Foot Care Study: incidence of, and risk factors for, new diabetic foot ulceration in a community-based patient cohort [J].
Abbott, CA ;
Carrington, AL ;
Ashe, H ;
Bath, S ;
Every, LC ;
Griffiths, J ;
Hann, AW ;
Hussein, A ;
Jackson, N ;
Johnson, KE ;
Ryder, CH ;
Torkington, R ;
Van Ross, ERE ;
Whalley, AM ;
Widdows, P ;
Williamson, S ;
Boulton, AJM .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2002, 19 (05) :377-384
[2]
[Anonymous], 1998, Med Health R I, V81, P359
[3]
The 10-g monofilament - The diagnostic divining rod for the diabetic foot? [J].
Armstrong, DG .
DIABETES CARE, 2000, 23 (07) :887-887
[4]
Choosing a practical screening instrument to identify patients at risk for diabetic foot ulceration [J].
Armstrong, DG ;
Lavery, LA ;
Vela, SA ;
Quebedeaux, TL ;
Fleischli, JG .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (03) :289-292
[5]
Bell-Krotoski J A, 1997, J Hand Ther, V10, P297
[6]
Differences in the performance of commercially available 10-g monofilaments [J].
Booth, J ;
Young, MJ .
DIABETES CARE, 2000, 23 (07) :984-988
[7]
The global burden of diabetic foot disease [J].
Boulton, AJM ;
Vileikyte, L ;
Ragnarson-Tennvall, G ;
Apelqvist, J .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9498) :1719-1724
[8]
The pathogenesis of diabetic foot problems: An overview [J].
Boulton, AJM .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1996, 13 :S12-S16
[9]
The diabetic foot: from art to science - The 18th Camillo Golgi lecture [J].
Boulton, AJM .
DIABETOLOGIA, 2004, 47 (08) :1343-1353
[10]
Boulton AJM, 2008, DIABETES CARE, V31, P1679, DOI 10.2337/dc08-9021