DOES IT PAY TO BE DIFFERENT? AN ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE SOCIAL AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

被引:914
作者
Brammer, Stephen [1 ]
Millington, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Sch Management, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
关键词
corporate social responsibility; firm performance;
D O I
10.1002/smj.714
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study explores the relationship between corporate social performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance (CFP) within the context of a specific component of CSP: corporate charitable giving. A model of the determinants of the extent of corporate charitable giving is estimated and used as the basis of a classification that groups firms according to the difference between their actual and their predicted intensity of gift giving. The financial performance attributes of the classification are explored. We found that firms with both unusually high and low CSP have higher financial performance than other firms, with unusually poor social performers doing best in the short run and unusually good social performers doing best over longer time horizons. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1325 / 1343
页数:19
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence [J].
Adams, M ;
Hardwick, P .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 1998, 35 (05) :641-654
[2]  
ALEXANDER GJ, 1978, ACAD MANAGE J, V21, P479, DOI 10.5465/255728
[3]  
[Anonymous], ACAD MANAGEMENT J
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1984, PITMAN SERIES BUSINE
[5]   STOCK OWNERSHIP AND COMPANY CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITY [J].
ATKINSON, L ;
GALASKIEWICZ, J .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1988, 33 (01) :82-100
[6]  
AUPPERLE KE, 1985, ACAD MANAGE J, V28, P446, DOI 10.5465/256210
[7]  
BARNETT ML, 2002, ACAD MANAGEMENT BEST, pB1
[8]  
BARTKUS BR, 2001, ANN M AC MAN WASH DC
[9]  
Benston G.J., 1982, Antitrust Bulletin, V27, P161
[10]   Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance [J].
Berman, SL ;
Wicks, AC ;
Kotha, S ;
Jones, TM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :488-506