Gender, financial risk, and probability weights

被引:192
作者
Fehr-Duda, H [1 ]
De Gennaro, M [1 ]
Schubert, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Ecol Res, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
gender differences; risk aversion; financial decision making; prospect theory; probability weighting function;
D O I
10.1007/s11238-005-4590-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Women are commonly stereotyped as more risk averse than men in financial decision making. In this paper we examine whether this stereotype reflects gender differences in actual risk-taking behavior by means of a laboratory experiment with monetary incentives. Gender differences in risk taking may be due to differences in valuations of outcomes or in probability weights. The results of our experiment indicate that value functions do not differ significantly between men and women. Men and women differ in their probability weighting schemes, however. In general, women tend to be less sensitive to probability changes. They also tend to underestimate large probabilities of gains more strongly than do men. This effect is particularly pronounced when the decisions are framed in investment terms. As a result, women appear to be more risk averse than men in specific circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 313
页数:31
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis [J].
Byrnes, JP ;
Miller, DC ;
Schafer, WD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (03) :367-383
[2]   Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk [J].
Eckel, CC ;
Grossman, PJ .
EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2002, 23 (04) :281-295
[3]   1977 RIETZ LECTURE - BOOTSTRAP METHODS - ANOTHER LOOK AT THE JACKKNIFE [J].
EFRON, B .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1979, 7 (01) :1-26
[4]   On the shape of the probability weighting function [J].
Gonzalez, R ;
Wu, G .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 38 (01) :129-166
[5]   Risk Attitudes of Children and Adults: Choices Over Small and Large Probability Gains and Losses [J].
Harbaugh, William T. ;
Krause, Kate ;
Vesterlund, Lise .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 5 (01) :53-84
[6]   THE INFLUENCE OF PROBABILITY ON RISKY CHOICE - A PARAMETRIC EXAMINATION [J].
LATTIMORE, PK ;
BAKER, JR ;
WITTE, AD .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1992, 17 (03) :377-400
[7]   A THEORY OF ANTICIPATED UTILITY [J].
QUIGGIN, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1982, 3 (04) :323-343
[8]   ADVANCES IN PROSPECT-THEORY - CUMULATIVE REPRESENTATION OF UNCERTAINTY [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1992, 5 (04) :297-323
[9]   Normal-randomness expected utility, time preference and emotional distortions [J].
Walther, H .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2003, 52 (02) :253-266