Conflict and the stochastic-dominance principle of decision making

被引:35
作者
Diederich, A
Busemeyer, JR [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Univ Oldenburg, D-2900 Oldenburg, Germany
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-9280.00167
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
One of the key principles underlying rational models of decision making is the idea that the decision maker should never choose an action that is stochastically dominated by another action. In the study reported in this article, violations of stochastic dominance frequently occurred when the payoffs produced by two actions were negatively correlated (in conflict), bur no violations occurred when the payoffs were positively correlated (no conflict). This finding is contrary to model which assume that choice probability depends on the utility of each action, and the utility for an action depends solely on its own payoffs and probabilities. This article also reports, Sor the first time ever; the distribution of response rimes observed in a risky decision task. Both the violations of stochastic dominance and the response rime distruibutions are explained in terms of a dynamic theory of decision making called multiattribute decision field theory.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 359
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MIND MOTION EXPLORAT
[2]   UTILITY MEASUREMENT - CONFIGURAL-WEIGHT THEORY AND THE JUDGES POINT-OF-VIEW [J].
BIRNBAUM, MH ;
COFFEY, G ;
MELLERS, BA ;
WEISS, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1992, 18 (02) :331-346
[3]   Violations of monotonicity in choices between gambles and certain cash [J].
Birnbaum, MH ;
Thompson, LA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 109 (04) :501-523
[4]   DECISION FIELD-THEORY - A DYNAMIC COGNITIVE APPROACH TO DECISION-MAKING IN AN UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT [J].
BUSEMEYER, JR ;
TOWNSEND, JT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 100 (03) :432-459
[5]  
Clemen R., 1996, Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis
[6]   Dynamic stochastic models for decision making under time constraints [J].
Diederich, A .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 41 (03) :260-274
[7]  
DIEDERICH A, 1999, UNPUB MULTIATTRIBUTE
[8]  
Janis L., 1977, Decision-making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment
[9]  
Luce R. D., 1965, Handbook of mathematical psychology, VIII, P249
[10]  
LUCE RD, 1992, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V5, P5