Migraine without aura and migraine with aura are distinct clinical entities: A study of four hundred and eighty-four male and female migraineurs from the general population

被引:265
作者
Russell, MB
Rasmussen, BK
Fenger, K
Olesen, J
机构
[1] UNIV COPENHAGEN,GLOSTRUP HOSP,DEPT INTERNAL MED C,DK-2600 GLOSTRUP,DENMARK
[2] UNIV COPENHAGEN,MED GENET LAB,INST MED BIOCHEM & GENET,COPENHAGEN N,DENMARK
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1468-2982.1996.1604239.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The clinical characteristics of migraine without aura (MO) and migraine with aura (MA) were compared in 484 migraineurs from the general population. We used the criteria of the International Headache Society. The lifetime prevalence of MO was 14.7% with a M:F ratio of 1:2.2; that of MA was 7.9% with a M:F ratio of 1:1.5. The female preponderance was significant in both MO and MA. The female preponderance was present in all age groups in MA,but was first apparent after menarche in MO, suggesting that female hormones are an initiating factor in MO, but not likely so in MA. The age at onset of MO followed a normal distribution, whereas the age at onset of MA was bimodally distributed, which could be explained by a composition of two normal distributions. The estimated separation between the two groups of MA was at age 26 years among the females and age 31 years among the males. The observed number of persons with co-occurrence of MO and MA was not significantly different from the expected number. The specificity and importance of premonitory symptoms are questioned, but prospective studies are needed. Bright light was a precipitating factor in MA, but not in MO. Menstruation was a precipitating factor in MO, but not likely in MA. Both MO and MA improved during pregnancy. The clinical differences indicate that MO and MA are distinct entities.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 245
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
ANDERSEN E, 1968, SKELETAL MATURATION
[2]   PROPHYLACTIC TREATMENT OF CLASSICAL AND NON-CLASSICAL MIGRAINE WITH METOPROLOL - A COMPARISON WITH PLACEBO [J].
ANDERSSON, PG ;
DAHL, S ;
HANSEN, JH ;
HANSEN, PE ;
HEDMAN, C ;
KRISTENSEN, TN ;
OLIVARIUS, BD .
CEPHALALGIA, 1983, 3 (04) :207-212
[3]   LIMITATIONS OF THE APPLICATION OF FOURFOLD TABLE ANALYSIS TO HOSPITAL DATA [J].
BERKSON, J .
BIOMETRICS BULLETIN, 1946, 2 (03) :47-53
[4]   MIGRAINE IN CHILDHOOD AND ITS PROGNOSIS [J].
BILLE, B .
CEPHALALGIA, 1981, 1 (02) :71-75
[5]  
Boldsen J L, 1993, Ugeskr Laeger, V155, P482
[6]  
Bousser Marie-Germaine, 1993, P413
[7]   IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CLASSIC AND COMMON MIGRAINE - WHAT IS MIGRAINE, AFTER ALL [J].
DALESSIO, DJ .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1985, 42 (03) :275-276
[8]   SOME CLINICAL COMPARISONS BETWEEN COMMON AND CLASSICAL MIGRAINE - A QUESTIONNAIRE-BASED STUDY [J].
DAVIES, PTG ;
PEATFIELD, RC ;
STEINER, TJ ;
BOND, RA ;
ROSE, FC .
CEPHALALGIA, 1991, 11 (05) :223-227
[9]   MIGRAINE PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH MIDDLE CEREBRAL-ARTERY DILATATION - REVERSAL BY SUMATRIPTAN [J].
FRIBERG, L ;
OLESEN, J ;
IVERSEN, HK ;
SPERLING, B .
LANCET, 1991, 338 (8758) :13-17
[10]   COMMON AND CLASSIC MIGRAINE - ONE OR 2 ENTITIES [J].
HACHINSKI, V .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1985, 42 (03) :277-277