Cardiac steady-state free precession CINE magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla - Impact of parallel imaging acceleration on volumetric accuracy and signal parameters

被引:36
作者
Wintersperger, BJ
Bauner, K
Reeder, SB
Friedrich, D
Dietrich, O
Sprung, KC
Picciolo, M
Nikolaou, K
Reiser, MF
Schoenberg, SO
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Univ Hosp Grosshadern, Dept Clin Radiol, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Madison, WI USA
[4] Siemens Med Solut, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
cardiac MRI; magnetic resonance (MR); cine study; SSFP; parallel imaging; 3.0; T;
D O I
10.1097/01.rli.0000192419.08733.37
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: We sought to evaluate the impact of 3.0 T on accelerated CINE steady-state free precession (SSFP) regarding signal parameters and its volumetric accuracy. Material and Methods: Ten individuals underwent cardiac CINE imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using standard single-slice CINE and multislice TSENSE-accelerated CINE (5 slices/breath-hold) with 4-fold acceleration. Data were evaluated for left ventricular volumetric parameters (EDV, ESV, and EF) as well as for SNR and CNR. Phantom based data allowed for g-factor evaluation for estimation of noise levels for accelerated data sets. Volumetric results and signal parameters were compared with results of single-slice UNE SSFP at 1.5 T as standard of reference (SOR). Results: Single-slice UNE at 3.0 T showed a similar to 90% increase in CNR compared with the SOR (P < 0.001). At 3.0 T, TSENSE CINE showed a less pronounced estimated loss in CNR (-58 +/- 6%) compared with single-slice CINE than at 1.5 T (-71 +/- 2%). 3.0 T TSENSE CINE showed a 21 +/- 18% lower CNR than the nonaccelerated 1.5 T CINE (P < 0.05). EF results for all data sets did not show any significant error while for EDV some errors have been encountered. Conclusion: 3.0 T permits compensation for the high CNR loss, which accompanies the 4-fold TSENSE acceleration at 1.5 T and shows volumetric accuracy. The use of parallel imaging may help to alleviate SAR limitations at higher field strength.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 147
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Assessment of ventricular function with single breath-hold real-time steady-state free precession cine MR Imaging [J].
Barkhausen, J ;
Goyen, M ;
Rühm, SG ;
Eggebrecht, H ;
Debatin, JF ;
Ladd, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (03) :731-735
[2]   MR evaluation of ventricular function: True fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: Feasibility study [J].
Barkhausen, J ;
Ruehm, SG ;
Goyen, M ;
Buck, T ;
Laub, G ;
Debatin, JF .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (01) :264-269
[3]   Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession [J].
Carr, JC ;
Simonetti, O ;
Bundy, J ;
Li, DB ;
Pereles, S ;
Finn, JP .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (03) :828-834
[4]   Signal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arrays [J].
Constantinides, CD ;
Atalar, E ;
McVeigh, ER .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1997, 38 (05) :852-857
[5]   Contrast-enhanced coronary artery imaging using 3D trueFISP [J].
Deshpande, VS ;
Li, DB .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 50 (03) :570-577
[6]   Generalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisitions (GRAPPA) [J].
Griswold, MA ;
Jakob, PM ;
Heidemann, RM ;
Nittka, M ;
Jellus, V ;
Wang, JM ;
Kiefer, B ;
Haase, A .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2002, 47 (06) :1202-1210
[7]   Field-of-view limitations in parallel imaging [J].
Griswold, MA ;
Kannengiesser, S ;
Heidemann, RM ;
Wang, JM ;
Jakob, PM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 52 (05) :1118-1126
[8]   Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla - Feasibility and implications for clinical applications [J].
Gutberlet, M ;
Noeske, R ;
Schwinge, K ;
Freyhardt, P ;
Felix, R ;
Niendorf, T .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) :154-167
[9]   Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging:: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T [J].
Gutberlet, M ;
Schwinge, K ;
Freyhardt, P ;
Spors, B ;
Grothoff, M ;
Denecke, T ;
Lüdemann, L ;
Noeske, R ;
Niendorf, T ;
Felix, R .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (08) :1586-1597
[10]   MEASUREMENT OF SIGNAL INTENSITIES IN THE PRESENCE OF NOISE IN MR IMAGES [J].
HENKELMAN, RM .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1985, 12 (02) :232-233