Ecometrics Identification, Categorization and Life Cycle Validation

被引:12
作者
Biswas, Gautam [1 ]
Clift, Roland [2 ]
Davis, Gary [3 ]
Ehrenfeld, John [4 ]
Foerster, Ruth [5 ]
Jolliet, Olivier [6 ]
Knoepfel, Ivo [7 ]
Luterbacher, Urs [8 ]
Russell, David [9 ]
Hunkeler, David [10 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, US Japan Ctr Technol Management, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] Univ Surrey, Ctr Environm Strategy, Guildford, Surrey, England
[3] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Clean Prod & Clean Technol, Knoxville, TN USA
[4] MIT, Technol Business & Environm Program, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[5] EMPA, Ecol Dept, St Gallen, Switzerland
[6] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Rural Engn, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[7] Swiss Reinsurance Co, Zurich, Switzerland
[8] Grad Inst Int Studies, Geneva, Switzerland
[9] Dow Europe, Horgen, Switzerland
[10] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Chem, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Eco-Indicators; Ecometrics; Life Cycle Assessment; Life Cycle Management; Sustainable Development;
D O I
10.1007/BF02977566
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Indicators which reflect environmental, economic, health and safety issues, have been categorized as microecometrics and macroecometrics. The former, generally flow based measures, have been developed for local, firm-wide or product based assessments. Microecometrics include materials intensity, energy consumption and emissions data, often from life cycle perspectives. They are, generally, intensive and are scaled with respect to unit of production, GDP or per capita, though other normalization factors have been proposed. In contrast macroecometrics tend to be extensive and represent global conditions such as temperatures and environmental concentrations. Ecometrics are subjective and reflect the dominant value of the individual, family unit, stakeholder group or firm. As such overaggregating or reducing the number of ecometrics for given applications, such as the rating of investments or access to credit, presents potential conflicts. Furthermore, while eco-indicators used for internal corporate reporting should not, necessarily, be validated, those microecometrics which involve external reporting, or multiple stakeholders, are arbitrary if not derived from, or based on, comprehensive life cycle approaches. This paper summarizes ECOMETRICS'98, a workshop held in Lausanne, Switzerland in January 19-20, 1998. It discusses ecometric needs of various users including consumers, designers, private sector decision makers as well as politicians and policy makers. A discussion regarding appropriate microecometrics for industrial sectors including chemical, pharmaceutical, insurance, finance, electronics, manufacturing and consumer products is also summarized.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 190
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
ALLENBY B., INT J LCA IN PRESS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, 14020 ISODIS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, 14024 ISODIS
[4]  
BISWAS G., 1998, ECOMETRICS 98 WORKSH
[5]  
CLIFT R., 1998, ECOMETRICS 99 WORKSH
[6]  
HUNKELER D., 1998, ECOMETRICS 98 WORKSH
[7]  
HUNKELER D., TOTAL QUALI IN PRESS
[8]  
Lehni M, 1998, STATE OF PLAY REPORT
[9]  
LUTHERBACHER U., 1998, ECOMETRICS 98 WORKSH
[10]  
SETAC, 1991, TECHN FRAM LIF CYCL