Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design

被引:770
作者
Rush, AJ
Fava, M
Wisniewski, SR
Lavori, PW
Trivedi, MH
Sackeim, HA
Thase, ME
Nierenberg, AA
Quitkin, FM
Kashner, TM
Kupfer, DJ
Rosenbaum, JF
Alpert, J
Stewart, JW
McGrath, PJ
Biggs, MM
Shores-Wilson, K
Lebowitz, BD
Ritz, L
Niederehe, G
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Clin Psychopharmacol Unit, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[4] Dept Vet Affairs, Cooperat Studies Program, Palo Alto, CA USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[6] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, New York, NY 10032 USA
[7] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY USA
[8] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[9] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Vet Affairs, Hlth Serv Res & Dev Serv, Dallas, TX USA
[10] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Dallas, TX USA
[11] NIMH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
来源
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS | 2004年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
major depressive disorder; antidepressants; cognitive therapy; randomized clinical trial; multistep multicenter clinical trial; utilization and costs;
D O I
10.1016/S0197-2456(03)00112-0
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
STAR*D is a multisite, prospective, randomized, multistep clinical trial of outpatients with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder. The study compares various treatment options for those who do not attain a satisfactory response with citalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant. The study enrolls 4000 adults (ages 18-75) from both primary and specialty care practices who have not had either a prior inadequate response or clear-cut intolerance to a robust trial of protocol treatments during the current major depressive episode. After receiving citalopram (level 1), participants without sufficient symptomatic benefit are eligible for randomization to level 2 treatments, which entail four switch options (sertraline, bupropion, venlafaxine, cognitive therapy) and three citalopram augment options (bupropion, buspirone, cognitive therapy). Those who receive cognitive therapy (switch or augment options) at level 2 without sufficient improvement are eligible for randomization to one of two level 2A switch options (venlafaxine or bupropion). Level 2 and 2A participants without sufficient improvement are eligible for random assignment to two switch options (mirtazapine or nortriptyline) and to two augment options (lithium or thyroid hormone) added to the primary antidepressant (citalopram, bupropion, sertraline, or venlafaxine) (level 3). Those without sufficient improvement at level 3 are eligible for level 4 random assignment to one of two switch options (tranylcypromine or the combination of mirtazapine and venlafaxine). The primary outcome is the clinician-rated, 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, administered at entry and exit from each treatment level through telephone interviews by assessors masked to treatment assignments. Secondary outcomes include self-reported depressive symptoms, physical and mental function, side-effect burden, client satisfaction, and health care utilization and cost. Participants with an adequate symptomatic response may enter the 12-month naturalistic follow-up phase with brief monthly and more complete quarterly assessments. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 142
页数:24
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1993, AM J PSYCHIAT, V150, P1
  • [2] Clark RE, 1996, HEALTH SERV RES, V31, P153
  • [3] Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
  • [4] The Texas Medication Algorithm Project: Report of the Texas Consensus Conference Panel on medication treatment of major depressive disorder
    Crismon, ML
    Trivedi, M
    Pigott, TA
    Rush, AJ
    Hirschfeld, RMA
    Kahn, DA
    DeBattista, C
    Nelson, JC
    Nierenberg, AA
    Sackeim, HA
    Thase, ME
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 60 (03) : 142 - 156
  • [5] Depression Guideline Panel, 1993, AHCPR PUBL, V2
  • [6] Clinical quality measurement - Comparing chart review and automated methodologies
    Dresser, MVB
    Feingold, L
    Rosenkranz, SL
    Coltin, KL
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (06) : 539 - 552
  • [7] Duan N., 1983, J EC BUSINESS STATIS, V1, P115, DOI [DOI 10.2307/1391852, DOI 10.1080/07350015.1983.10509330]
  • [8] ENDICOTT J, 1993, PSYCHOPHARMACOL BULL, V29, P321
  • [9] Prevention of recurrent depression with cognitive behavioral therapy - Preliminary findings
    Fava, GA
    Rafanelli, C
    Grandi, S
    Conti, S
    Belluardo, P
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 55 (09) : 816 - 820
  • [10] Major depressive subtypes and treatment response
    Fava, M
    Uebelacker, LA
    Alpert, JE
    Nierenberg, AA
    Pava, JA
    Rosenbaum, JF
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 42 (07) : 568 - 576