Industrial location in developing countries

被引:41
作者
Deichmann, Uwe [1 ]
Lall, Somik V. [2 ]
Redding, Stephen J. [3 ]
Venables, Anthony J. [4 ]
机构
[1] World Bank, Dev Res Grp, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[2] World Bank, Sustainable Dev Network, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[3] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London WC2A 2AE, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1093/wbro/lkn007
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Despite a diminishing role in industrial countries, the manufacturing sector continues to be an engine of economic growth in most developing countries. This article surveys the evidence on the determinants of industry location in developing countries. It also employs micro data for India and Indonesia to illustrate recent spatial dynamics of manufacturing relocation within urban agglomerations. Both theory and empirical evidence suggest that agglomeration benefits, market access, and infrastructure endowments in large cities outweigh the costs of congestion, higher wages, and land prices. Despite this evidence, many countries have tried to encourage industrial firms to locate in secondary cities or other lagging areas. Cross-country evidence suggests that fiscal incentives to do so rarely succeed. They appear to influence business location decisions among comparable locations, but the result may be a negative-sum game between regions and inefficiently low tax rates, which prevent public goods from being funded at sufficiently high levels. Relocation tends to be within and between agglomerations rather than from large cities to smaller cities or lagging regions. Rather than provide subsidies and tax breaks, policymakers should focus on streamlining laws and regulations to make the business environment more attractive.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 246
页数:28
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
AMITI M, 2004, 4234 CEPR
[2]  
AMITI M, 2005, WP0555 INT MON FUND
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, 7503 NBER
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, World Development Indicators Online
[5]  
[Anonymous], 3477 WORLD BANK
[6]  
[Anonymous], IND POLICY 21 CENTUR
[7]   IS PUBLIC-EXPENDITURE PRODUCTIVE [J].
ASCHAUER, DA .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1989, 23 (02) :177-200
[8]  
Bairoch Paul., 1988, CITIES EC DEV
[9]  
Bartik, 1991, WHO BENEFITS STATE L
[10]  
BARTIK TJ, 1994, NATL TAX J, V47, P847