CO2 mitigation costs for new renewable energy capacity in the Mexican electricity sector using renewable energies

被引:14
作者
Islas, J [1 ]
Manzini, F [1 ]
Martínez, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Energy Res Ctr, Temixco 62580, Morelos, Mexico
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.solener.2003.06.001
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Carbon dioxide mitigation costs for the Mexican power sector are calculated in order to compare the business as usual (BAU) scenario, based on natural gas capacity growth, to a transition scenario where electricity generation growth using natural gas after 2007 is replaced by renewable energies (solar, wind, hydro and biomass). The mitigation costs are obtained using the following parameters: natural gas price, discount rate and technological progress. The latter is expressed in terms of the anticipated decrease in capital costs, as reported in electricity generation technological literature. Our results show that when technological progress is considered, CO2 mitigation costs decrease rapidly from 14 $/tCO(2) (in this paper $ express 1997 US dollars and t means metric tons) to zero when the price of natural gas nears 2.68 $/GJ, (for some readers, it can be useful to know that 1.0 US$1997/GJ is 1.19 US$2001/MMBTU) which is almost the same as the 2002 price. This means that for middle natural gas prices a "no regrets" situation can be achieved. Our results also show that for prices higher than 2.80 $/GJ, the incorporation of the technological progress parameter transforms the transition scenario into a "no regrets" scenario for all the discount rate values considered in this study. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 507
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ORNLCON476 INT WORK
[2]  
[Anonymous], EN TECHN 21 CENT
[3]  
[Anonymous], MIT AD COST ASS CONC
[4]  
Bernstein M., 1999, DEV COUNTRIES GLOBAL
[5]  
*CFE, 1996, COST PAR REF FORM PR
[6]  
*CFE, 2000, COST PAR REF FORM PR
[7]  
Chandler W., 2002, Climate Change mitigation in developing countries: Brazil, China, India, Mexico, South Africa, and Turkey
[8]  
*CISCC, 2001, 2 NAT COMM US FRAM C
[9]  
*DOF, 1993, DIAR OF FED
[10]  
EOLICA F, 2001, COMMUNICATION