Trends and methodological impacts in soil CO2 efflux partitioning:: A metaanalytical review

被引:501
作者
Subke, Jens-Arne [1 ]
Inglima, Ilaria
Cotrufo, M. Francesca
机构
[1] Univ York, Stockholm Environm Inst, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Naples 2, Dept Environm Sci, I-81100 Caserta, Italy
关键词
autotrophic respiration; carbon cycling; heterotrophic respiration; metaanalysis; partitioning techniques; root respiration; soil CO2 flux;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01117.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Partitioning soil carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux (R-S) into autotrophic (R-A; including plant roots and closely associated organisms) and heterotrophic (R-H) components has received considerable attention, as differential responses of these components to environmental change have profound implications for the soil and ecosystem C balance. The increasing number of partitioning studies allows a more detailed analysis of experimental constraints than was previously possible. We present results of an exhaustive literature search of partitioning studies and analyse global trends in flux partitioning between biomes and ecosystem types by means of a metaanalysis. Across all data, an overall decline in the R-H/R-S ratio for increasing annual R-S fluxes emerged. For forest ecosystems, boreal coniferous sites showed significantly higher (P < 0.05) R-H/R-S ratios than temperate sites, while both temperate or tropical deciduous forests did not differ in ratios from any of the other forest types. While chronosequence studies report consistent declines in the R-H/R-S ratio with age, no difference could be detected for different age groups in the global data set. Different methodologies showed generally good agreement if the range of R-S under which they had been measured was considered, with the exception of studies estimating R-H by means of root mass regressions against R-S, which resulted in consistently lower R-H/R-S estimates out of all methods included. Additionally, the time step over which fluxes were partitioned did not affect R-H/R-S ratios consistently. To put results into context, we review the most common techniques and point out the likely sources of errors associated with them. In order to improve soil CO2 efflux partitioning in future experiments, we include methodological recommendations, and also highlight the potential interactions between soil components that may be overlooked as a consequence of the partitioning process itself. Partitioning soil carbon dioxide (CO2) efflux (R-S) into autotrophic (R-A; including plant roots and closely associated organisms) and heterotrophic (R-H) components has received considerable attention, as differential responses of these components to environmental change have profound implications for the soil and ecosystem C balance. The increasing number of partitioning studies allows a more detailed analysis of experimental constraints than was previously possible. We present results of an exhaustive literature search of partitioning studies and analyse global trends in flux partitioning between biomes and ecosystem types by means of a metaanalysis. Across all data, an overall decline in the R-H/R-S ratio for increasing annual R-S fluxes emerged. For forest ecosystems, boreal coniferous sites showed significantly higher (P < 0.05) R-H/R-S ratios than temperate sites, while both temperate or tropical deciduous forests did not differ in ratios from any of the other forest types. While chronosequence studies report consistent declines in the R-H/R-S ratio with age, no difference could be detected for different age groups in the global data set. Different methodologies showed generally good agreement if the range of R-S under which they had been measured was considered, with the exception of studie estimating R-H by means of root mass regressions against R-S, which resulted in consistently lower R-H/R-S estimates out of all methods included. Additionally, the time step over which fluxes were partitioned did not affect R-H/R-S ratios consistently. To put results into context, we review the most common techniques and point out the likely sources of errors associated with them. In order to improve soil CO2 efflux partitioning in future experiments, we include methodological recommendations, and also highlight the potential interactions between soil components that may be overlooked as a consequence of the partitioning process itself.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 943
页数:23
相关论文
共 156 条
[1]   Separation of root respiration from total soil respiration using carbon-13 labeling during Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment (FACE) [J].
Andrews, JA ;
Harrison, KG ;
Matamala, R ;
Schlesinger, WH .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1999, 63 (05) :1429-1435
[2]   Soil CO2 dynamics, acidification, and chemical weathering in a temperate forest with experimental CO2 enrichment [J].
Andrews, JA ;
Schlesinger, WH .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2001, 15 (01) :149-162
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, PHILOS T R SOC B, DOI DOI 10.1098/rstb.1990.0177
[4]  
Arneth A, 1998, TREE PHYSIOL, V18, P785
[5]   Response of root respiration to changes in temperature and its relevance to global warming [J].
Atkin, OK ;
Edwards, EJ ;
Loveys, BR .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2000, 147 (01) :141-154
[6]   The hot and the cold: unravelling the variable response of plant respiration to temperature [J].
Atkin, OK ;
Bruhn, D ;
Hurry, VM ;
Tjoelker, MG .
FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY, 2005, 32 (02) :87-105
[7]   Thermal acclimation and the dynamic response of plant respiration to temperature [J].
Atkin, OK ;
Tjoelker, MG .
TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2003, 8 (07) :343-351
[8]   Soil and rhizosphere microorganisms have the same Q10 for respiration in a model system [J].
Bååth, E ;
Wallander, H .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2003, 9 (12) :1788-1791
[9]   ROOT CONTRIBUTION TO TOTAL SOIL METABOLISM IN A TROPICAL FOREST SOIL FROM ORISSA, INDIA [J].
BEHERA, N ;
JOSHI, SK ;
PATI, DP .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1990, 36 (2-4) :125-134
[10]   Tree root and soil heterotrophic respiration as revealed by girdling of boreal Scots pine forest:: extending observations beyond the first year [J].
BhupinderpalSingh ;
Nordgren, A ;
Löfvenius, MO ;
Högberg, MN ;
Mellander, PE ;
Högberg, P .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 26 (08) :1287-1296