Efficiency study of estimators for a treatment effect in a pretest-posttest trial

被引:125
作者
Yang, L
Tsiatis, AA
机构
[1] SAS Inst Inc, Cary, NC 27513 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Stat, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
analysis of covariance; GEE model; paired t test; semiparametric model; two-sample t test;
D O I
10.1198/000313001753272466
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Several possible methods, used to evaluate treatment effects in a randomized pretest-posttest trial with two treatment groups are the two-sample t test, the paired t test, analysis of covariance I (ANCOVA I), the analysis of covariance II (ANCOVA W), and generalized estimating equations (GEE). The ANCOVA I includes treatment and baseline response as covariates in a linear model and ANCOVA H additionally includes an interaction term between the baseline response and treatment indicator as a covariate. The parameters in the ANCOVA I and ANCOVA H models are generally estimated using ordinary least squares. In this article, a semiparametric model, which makes no assumptions about the response distributions, is used. The asymptotic properties of the estimators derived from these five methods and their relative efficiencies are discussed under this semiparametric model. We show that all these methods yield consistent estimators for the treatment effect which have asymptotically normal distributions under the semiparametric model. The GEE and the ANCOVA H estimators are asymptotically equivalent and the most efficient. The estimators from other three methods are less efficient except under some special conditions which are outlined in the article.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 321
页数:8
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   ASYMPTOTIC EFFICIENCY IN ESTIMATION WITH CONDITIONAL MOMENT RESTRICTIONS [J].
CHAMBERLAIN, G .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1987, 34 (03) :305-334
[2]   ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE IN PARALLEL-GROUP CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH PRETREATMENT BASELINES [J].
CRAGER, MR .
BIOMETRICS, 1987, 43 (04) :895-901
[4]   THE EFFECT OF SCREENING ON SOME PRETEST POSTTEST TEST VARIANCES [J].
FOLLMANN, DA .
BIOMETRICS, 1991, 47 (02) :763-771
[5]   FURTHER COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF PRETEST-POSTTEST RESEARCH DESIGNS [J].
LAIRD, N .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1983, 37 (04) :329-330
[6]   SEMIPARAMETRIC EFFICIENCY BOUNDS [J].
NEWEY, WK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 1990, 5 (02) :99-135
[7]  
PIGRACHE RM, 1976, BIOL PSYCHOL, V4, P213
[8]   Regression models for the analysis of pretest/posttest data [J].
Singer, JM ;
Andrade, DF .
BIOMETRICS, 1997, 53 (02) :729-735
[9]  
STEIN RA, 1989, ASA BIOPARMACEUTICAL, P274
[10]   LONGITUDINAL DATA-ANALYSIS FOR DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS OUTCOMES [J].
ZEGER, SL ;
LIANG, KY .
BIOMETRICS, 1986, 42 (01) :121-130