Sensitivity of Streamflow Simulations to Temporal Variability and Estimation of Z-R Relationships

被引:16
作者
Habib, Emad [1 ]
Malakpet, Chakradhar G. [1 ]
Tokay, Ali [2 ,3 ]
Kucera, Paul A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisiana Lafayette, Dept Civil Engn, Lafayette, LA 70504 USA
[2] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Joint Ctr Earth Syst Technol, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
[3] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[4] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Res Applicat Lab, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:12(1177)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study focuses on the sensitivity of streamflow simulations to temporal variations in radar reflectivity-rainfall (i.e., Z-R) relationships. The physically based continuous-mode distributed hydrologic model-gridded surface subsurface hydrologic analysis-is used to predict runoff during three major rainfall-runoff periods observed in a 35 km(2) experimental watershed in southern Louisiana. Z-R relationships are derived at a series of temporal scales ranging from a climatological scale, where interstorm Z-R variations are ignored, down to a subevent scale, where variations in rainfall type (convective versus stratiform) are taken into account. The analysis is first performed using Z and R data pairs derived directly from disdrometer drop size distribution measurements, and then repeated using WSR-88D radar reflectivity data. The degree of sensitivity in runoff simulations to temporal variations in Z-R relationships depends largely on the method used to derive the parameters of these relationships. Using event-specific Z-R relationships results in accurate hydrographs when the parameters are derived based on bias removal and minimization of random errors of rainfall estimates. Methods based on least-squares fitting require refining the derivation of Z-R parameters down to a subevent scale, which is not practically feasible. A simple and practical method based on selection of a climatologically representative exponent of the Z-R relationships and adjusting the multiplier coefficient through bias removal still results in reasonably accurate runoff simulations, but only when event-specific Z-R relationships are used.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1186
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Anagnostou EN, 2001, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V18, P616, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<0616:TUOTPR>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]   Systematic variation of drop size and radar-rainfall relations [J].
Atlas, D ;
Ulbrich, CW ;
Marks, FD ;
Amitai, E ;
Williams, CR .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D6) :6155-6169
[4]  
Battan, 1973, RADAR OBSERVATIONS A
[5]  
BEARD KV, 1976, J ATMOS SCI, V33, P851, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<0851:TVASOC>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   NEXRAD RADAR FOR FLOOD PREDICTION IN HOUSTON [J].
Bedient, Philip B. ;
Hoblit, Brian C. ;
Gladwell, Dawn C. ;
Vieux, Baxter E. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2000, 5 (03) :269-277
[8]   Accuracy of radar rainfall estimates for streamflow simulation [J].
Borga, M .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2002, 267 (1-2) :26-39
[9]  
Campos E, 2000, J APPL METEOROL, V39, P1088, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<1088:IUIZRR>2.0.CO
[10]  
2