Simulating the river-basin response to atmospheric forcing by linking a mesoscale meteorological model and hydrologic model system

被引:100
作者
Yu, Z [1 ]
Lakhtakia, MN
Yarnal, B
White, RA
Miller, DA
Frakes, B
Barron, EJ
Duffy, C
Schwartz, FW
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Ctr Earth Syst Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Geol Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
hydroclimatic modeling; hydrologic model system; mesoscale meteorological model; river-basin hydrology; Susquehanna River Basin;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00022-0
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The purpose of this article is to test the ability of a distributed meteorological/hydrologic model to simulate the hydrologic response to three single-storm events passing over the Upper West Branch of the Susquehanna River Basin. The high-resolution precipitation fields for three storms are provided by observations and by the Penn State-NCAR Mesoscale Meteorological Model (MM5) with three nested domains. The MM5 simulation successfully captures the storm patterns over the study area, although some temporal and spatial discrepancies exist between observed and simulated precipitation fields. Observed and simulated precipitation data for those storms are used to drive the Hydrologic Model System (HMS). The output from HMS is compared to the measured hydrographic streamflow at the outlet of the Upper West Branch. The Curve Number and Green-Ampt methods of rainfall-runoff partitioning are used in HMS and evaluated for streamflow simulation. The results of the hydrologic simulation compare well with observed data when using the Curve Number partitioning, but underestimate observed data when using the Green-Ampt. The likely cause is the lack of heterogeneity in hydraulic parameters. The simulated streamflow with the MMS-simulated precipitation is lower than the simulated streamflow with observed precipitation. The experiments suggest that the subgrid-scale spatial variability in precipitation and hydraulic parameters should be included in future model development (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 91
页数:20
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   AN INTRODUCTION TO THE EUROPEAN HYDROLOGICAL SYSTEM - SYSTEME HYDROLOGIQUE EUROPEEN, SHE .2. STRUCTURE OF A PHYSICALLY-BASED, DISTRIBUTED MODELING SYSTEM [J].
ABBOTT, MB ;
BATHURST, JC ;
CUNGE, JA ;
OCONNELL, PE ;
RASMUSSEN, J .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1986, 87 (1-2) :61-77
[2]   ON ESTIMATING PARTIAL DERIVATIVES FOR BIVARIATE INTERPOLATION OF SCATTERED DATA [J].
AKIMA, H .
ROCKY MOUNTAIN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, 1984, 14 (01) :41-52
[3]  
ANDRE JC, 1986, B AM METEOROL SOC, V67, P138, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1986)067<0138:HAHAEF>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1972, Soil conservation service. National engineering handbook. Hydrology section 4
[6]  
ARNOLD JG, 1991, BASIN SCALE SIMULATI, P255
[7]  
AVISSAR R, 1989, MON WEATHER REV, V117, P2113, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<2113:APOHLS>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   PHYSICALLY-BASED DISTRIBUTED MODELING OF AN UPLAND CATCHMENT USING THE SYSTEME HYDROLOGIQUE EUROPEEN [J].
BATHURST, JC .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1986, 87 (1-2) :79-102
[10]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298