Comparison of the efficacy and safety of Eudragit-L-coated mesalazine tablets with ethylcellulose-coated mesalazine tablets in patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis

被引:36
作者
Gibson, PR
Fixa, B
Pekárková, B
Bátovsky, M
Radford-Smith, G
Tibitanzl, J
Gabalec, L
Florin, THJ
Greinwald, R
机构
[1] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Hosp, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
[3] Private Gastroenterol Ctr, Trnava, Slovakia
[4] FNsP ak Derera 3, Interni Klin, Bratislava, Slovakia
[5] Royal Brisbane Hosp, Herston, Qld, Australia
[6] Nemocnice Hranice as, Hranice na Morave, Czech Republic
[7] Dist Hosp, Usti nad Orlici, Czech Republic
[8] Adult Hosp, Mater Hlth Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[9] Dr Falk Pharma GmbH, Baden Wurttemberg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02861.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background There are no comparative studies of coated mesalazine. Aim To compare the efficacy and tolerability of Eudragit-L- and ethylcellulose-coated mesalazine tablets in patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis. Methods A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized parallel group trial was performed across 18 centres in Australia, and 20 in Eastern Europe. Patients were treated with 3 g mesalazine for 8 weeks with the primary efficacy end point being clinical remission. Results Of 215 patients, 69% achieved clinical remission in both treatment groups (P < 0.001; chi-square test) with no differences in frequency of adverse events. In the Australian cohort (n = 63), the Eudragit-L group had a higher remission rate (73% vs. 36%) and responded 13 days faster, compared with those in the European group (67% vs. 84%, and 2 days respectively). No clear reasons for differences in treatment responses were identified. Conclusions Eudragit-L and ethylcellulose-coated mesalazine tablets are well tolerated and equally effective in achieving remission in mild-moderately active ulcerative colitis over 8 weeks.
引用
收藏
页码:1017 / 1026
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
Inflammatory bowel disease and smoking -: A review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and therapeutic implications [J].
Birrenbach, T ;
Böcker, U .
INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2004, 10 (06) :848-859
[2]
Christensen LA, 2000, DAN MED BULL, V47, P20
[3]
TEST STATISTICS AND SAMPLE-SIZE FORMULAS FOR COMPARATIVE BINOMIAL TRIALS WITH NULL HYPOTHESIS OF NONZERO RISK DIFFERENCE OR NON-UNITY RELATIVE RISK [J].
FARRINGTON, CP ;
MANNING, G .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1990, 9 (12) :1447-1454
[4]
Mesalazine 4 g daily given as prolonged-release granules twice daily and four times daily is at least as effective as prolonged-release tablets four times daily in patients with ulcerative colitis [J].
Farup, PG ;
Hinterleitner, TA ;
Lukás, M ;
Hébuterne, X ;
Rachmilewitz, D ;
Campieri, M ;
Meier, R ;
Keller, R ;
Rathbone, B ;
Oddsson, E .
INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2001, 7 (03) :237-242
[5]
Review article:: natural history and epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori injection [J].
Go, MF .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 16 :3-15
[6]
HANAUER S, 1993, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V88, P1188
[7]
Topical delivery of therapeutic agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease [J].
Klotz, U ;
Schwab, M .
ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 2005, 57 (02) :267-279
[8]
Low dose balsalazide (1.5 g twice daily) and mesalazine (0.5 g three times daily) maintained remission of ulcerative colitis but high dose balsalazide (3.0 g twice daily) was superior in preventing relapses [J].
Kruis, W ;
Schreiber, S ;
Theuer, D ;
Brandes, JW ;
Schütz, E ;
Howaldt, S ;
Krakamp, B ;
Hämling, J ;
Mönnikes, H ;
Koop, I ;
Stolte, M ;
Pallant, D ;
Ewald, U .
GUT, 2001, 49 (06) :783-789
[9]
Kruis W, 1998, ALIMENT PHARM THER, V12, P707
[10]
The Optimal Dose of 5-Aminosalicylic Acid in Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Dose-Finding Study With Newly Developed Mesalamine [J].
Kruis, Wolfgang ;
Bar-Meir, Simon ;
Feher, Janos ;
Mickisch, Oliver ;
Mlitz, Horst ;
Faszczyk, Marek ;
Chowers, Yehuda ;
Lengyele, Gabriella ;
Kovacs, Agota ;
Lakatos, Laszlo ;
Stolte, Manfred ;
Vieth, Michael ;
Greinwald, Roland .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2003, 1 (01) :36-43