Reasons for not reporting adverse incidents: an empirical study

被引:207
作者
Vincent, C [1 ]
Stanhope, N [1 ]
Crowley-Murphy, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Univ Coll, Dept Psychol, Clin Risk Unit, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
clinical indicators; incident reporting; risk management;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2753.1999.00147.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
A previous study (Stanhope et al. 1998) established that staff in two obstetric units reported less than a quarter of designated incidents to the units' risk managers. A questionnaire was administered to 42 obstetricians and 156 midwives at the same:two Obstetric units, exploring the reasons for low rates of reporting. Questions concerned their knowledge of their unit's incident reporting system; whether they would report a series of 10 designated adverse obstetric incidents to the risk manager; and their views on 12 potential reasons for not reporting incidents. Most staff knew about the incident-reporting system in their unit, but almost 30% did not know how to find a list of reportable incidents. Views on the necessity of reporting the 10 designated obstetric incidents varied considerably. For example, 96% of staff stated they would always report a maternal death, whereas less than 40% would report a baby's unexpected admission to the Special Care Baby Unit. Midwives said they were more likely to report incidents than doctors, and junior staff were more likely to report than senior staff. The main reasons for not reporting were fears that junior staff would be blamed, high workload and the belief (even though the incident was designated as reportable) that the circumstances or outcome of a particular case did not warrant a report. Junior doctors felt less supported by their colleagues than senior doctors. Current systems of incident reporting, while providing some valuable information, do not provide a reliable index of the rate of adverse incidents. Recommended measures to increase reliability include clearer definitions of incidents, simplified methods of reporting, designated staff to record incidents and education, feedback and reassurance to staff about the nature and purpose of such systems.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 21
页数:9
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   THE QUALITY OF ROUTINELY COLLECTED MATERNITY DATA [J].
CLEARY, R ;
BEARD, RW ;
COLES, J ;
DEVLIN, HB ;
HOPKINS, AH ;
ROBERTS, S ;
SCHUMACHER, D ;
WICKINGS, HI .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (12) :1042-1047
[2]   THE INCIDENT REPORTING SYSTEM DOES NOT DETECT ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS - A PROBLEM FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT [J].
CULLEN, DJ ;
BATES, DW ;
SMALL, SD ;
COOPER, JB ;
NEMESKAL, AR ;
LEAPE, LL .
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, 1995, 21 (10) :541-548
[3]   ADVERSE INCIDENT REPORTING IN INTENSIVE-CARE [J].
HART, GK ;
BALDWIN, I ;
GUTTERIDGE, G ;
FORD, J .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1994, 22 (05) :556-561
[4]   COMPLIANCE WITH AN INCIDENT REPORT SCHEME IN ANESTHESIA [J].
JAYASURIYA, JP ;
ANANDACIVA, S .
ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 50 (10) :846-849
[5]  
KLETZ TA, 1990, LEARNING ACCIDENTS I
[6]  
O'connor AM, 1996, CLIN RISK, V2, P119
[7]   PHYSICIAN REPORTING COMPARED WITH MEDICAL-RECORD REVIEW TO IDENTIFY ADVERSE MEDICAL EVENTS [J].
ONEIL, AC ;
PETERSEN, LA ;
COOK, EF ;
BATES, DW ;
LEE, TH ;
BRENNAN, TA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 119 (05) :370-376
[8]  
STANHOPE N, 1998, J EVALUATION CLIN PR
[9]  
Van der Schaaf TW., 1991, NEAR MISS REPORTING