Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace

被引:306
作者
Twenge, Jean M. [1 ]
Campbell, Stacy M. [2 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Dept Psychol, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[2] Kennesaw State Univ, Dept Management & Entrepreneurship, Kennesaw, GA USA
关键词
Age groups; Workplace; Individual psychology; Interpersonal relations;
D O I
10.1108/02683940810904367
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review data from 1.4 million people who completed personality, attitude, psychopathology, or behavior scales between the 1930s and the present and to discuss how those differences may impact today's workplace. Design/methodology/approach - The data are gathered from research reports using psychological scales over the last eight decades, primarily those using college student samples. Findings - Generation Me (sometimes called Gen Y or Millennials) demonstrates higher self-esteem, narcissism, anxiety, and depression; lower need for social approval; more external locus of control; and women with more agentic traits. Practical implications - Managers should expect to see more employees with unrealistically high expectations, a high need for praise, difficulty with criticism, an increase in creativity demands, job-hopping, ethics scandals, casual dress, and shifting workplace norms for women. Organizations can respond to these changes with accommodations (e.g. praise programs) or with counter pressure (e.g. dress codes), and it is imperative that managers consider the best reaction for their workforce. Originality/value - Most studies of generations interview workers at one time; thus any differences could be due to age or generation. Many of these reports are also based on subjective opinions and perceptions. In contrast, the paper reviews quantitative data on generational differences controlling for age. This empirically based look at generations in the workplace should be useful to managers and workers.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 877
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MANAGING GENERATION
[2]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL CONTRACTS OR
[3]  
Arthur M.B., 1996, BOUNDARYLESS CAREER, P3
[4]   Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors [J].
Avolio, BJ ;
Gardner, WL ;
Walumbwa, FO ;
Luthans, F ;
May, DR .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2004, 15 (06) :801-823
[5]  
BERN SL, 1974, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V42, P155, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0036215
[6]   LOCUS OF CONTROL AS A POTENTIAL MODERATOR OF THE TURNOVER PROCESS [J].
BLAU, GJ .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 60 (01) :21-29
[7]  
BRENNER OC, 1989, ACAD MANAGE J, V32, P662, DOI 10.5465/256439
[8]   Ethical leadership:: A review and future directions [J].
Brown, Michael E. ;
Trevino, Linda K. .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2006, 17 (06) :595-616
[9]   Understanding the social costs of narcissism: The case of the tragedy of the commons [J].
Campbell, WK ;
Bush, CP ;
Brunell, AB ;
Shelton, J .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2005, 31 (10) :1358-1368
[10]   PERSONALITY IN THE LIFE COURSE [J].
CASPI, A .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 53 (06) :1203-1213