Redo carotid endarterectomy versus primary carotid endarterectomy

被引:65
作者
AbuRahma, AF
Jennings, TG
Wulu, JT
Tarakji, L
Robinson, PA
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Robert C Byrd Hlth Sci Ctr, Charleston Area Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Charleston, WV 25304 USA
[2] Camcare Hlth Educ & Res Inst, Charleston, WV USA
[3] Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceut Inc, Ridgefield, CT 06877 USA
关键词
carotid endarterectomy; carotid stenosis; recurrence; stents;
D O I
10.1161/hs1201.099649
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-Several authorities have recently advocated carotid stenting for recurrent carotid stenosis because of the perception that redo surgery has a higher complication rate than primary carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study compares the early and late results of reoperations versus primary CEA. Methods-All reoperations for recurrent carotid stenosis performed during a recent 7-year period by a single vascular surgeon were compared with primary CEA. Because all redo CEAs were done with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or vein patch closure, we only analyzed those primary CEAs that used the same patch closures. A Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis was used to estimate stroke-free survival rates and freedom from greater than or equal to 50% recurrent stenosis. Results-Of 547 primary CEAs, 265 had PTFE or saphenous vein patch closure, and 124 reoperations had PTFE or vein patch closure during the same period. Both groups had similar demographic characteristics. The indications for reoperation and primary CEA were symptomatic stenosis in 78% and 58% of cases and asymptomatic 80% stenosis in 22% and 42% of cases, respectively (P < 0.001). The 30-day perioperative stroke and transient ischemic attack rates for reoperation and primary CEA were 4.8% versus 0.8% (P = 0.015) and 4% versus 1.1%, respectively, with no perioperative deaths in either group. Cranial nerve injury was noted in 17% of reoperation patients versus 5.3% of primary CEA patients; however, most of these injuries were transient (P < 0.001). Mean hospital stay was 1.8 days for reoperation versus 1.6 days for primary CEA. Cumulative rates of stroke-free survival and freedom from greater than or equal to 50% recurrent stenosis for reoperation and primary CEA at 1, 3, and 5 years were 96%, 91%, and 82% and 98%, 96%, and 95% versus 94%, 92%, and 91% and 98%, 96%, and 96%, respectively (no significant differences). Conclusions-Re ope ration carries higher perioperative stroke and cranial nerve injury rates than primary CEA. However, reoperations are durable and have stroke-free survival rates that are similar to primary CEA. These considerations should be kept in mind when carotid stenting is recommended instead of reoperation.
引用
收藏
页码:2787 / 2792
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Prospective randomized trial of bilateral carotid endarterectomies - Primary closure versus patching [J].
AbuRahma, AF ;
Robinson, PA ;
Saiedy, S ;
Richmond, BK ;
Khan, J .
STROKE, 1999, 30 (06) :1185-1189
[2]   Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure and patch angioplasty with saphenous vein, jugular vein, and polytetrafluoroethylene: Long-term follow-up [J].
AbuRahma, AF ;
Robinson, PA ;
Saiedy, S ;
Khan, JH ;
Boland, JP .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 27 (02) :222-232
[3]   Effect of contralateral severe stenosis or carotid occlusion on duplex criteria of ipsilateral stenoses: Comparative study of various duplex parameters [J].
AbuRahma, AF ;
Richmond, BK ;
Robinson, PA ;
Khan, S ;
Pollack, JA ;
Alberts, S .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 22 (06) :751-762
[4]  
*AS CAR ATH STUD, 1994, STROKE, V25, P2523
[5]   SUGGESTED STANDARDS FOR REPORTS DEALING WITH CEREBROVASCULAR-DISEASE [J].
BAKER, JD ;
RUTHERFORD, RB ;
BERNSTEIN, EF ;
COURBIER, R ;
ERNST, CB ;
KEMPCZINSKI, RF ;
RILES, TS ;
ZARINS, CK .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1988, 8 (06) :721-729
[6]  
Baker W, 1997, Cardiovasc Surg, V5, P461
[7]   Sites of recurrence and long-term results of redo surgery [J].
Ballinger, BA ;
Money, SR ;
Chatman, DM ;
Bowen, JC ;
Ochsner, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 225 (05) :512-515
[8]   RECURRENT CAROTID STENOSIS - OPERATIVE STRATEGY AND LATE RESULTS [J].
BARTLETT, FF ;
RAPP, JH ;
GOLDSTONE, J ;
EHRENFELD, WK ;
STONEY, RJ .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1987, 5 (03) :452-456
[9]   ASSESSING RISK ASSOCIATED WITH CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY - A STATEMENT FOR HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS BY AN AD HOC COMMITTEE ON CAROTID SURGERY STANDARDS OF THE STROKE COUNCIL, AMERICAN-HEART-ASSOCIATION [J].
BEEBE, HG ;
CLAGETT, GP ;
DEWEESE, JA ;
MOORE, WS ;
ROBERTSON, JT ;
SANDOK, B ;
WOLF, PA .
CIRCULATION, 1989, 79 (02) :472-473
[10]  
Bergeron P, 1996, J ENDOVASC SURG, V3, P76, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1996)003<0076:RCDWSB>2.0.CO