Effectiveness of gestational diabetes treatment: A systematic review with quality of evidence assessment

被引:114
作者
Falavigna, Maicon [1 ]
Schmidt, Maria I. [1 ]
Trujillo, Janet [1 ]
Alves, Luisia F. [1 ]
Wendland, Eliana R. [2 ]
Torloni, Maria R. [3 ]
Colagiuri, Stephen [4 ]
Duncan, Bruce B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Post Grad Program Epidemiol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Ciencias Saude Porto Alegre, Dept Publ Hlth, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Obstet, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Sydney, Boden Inst Obes Nutr & Exercise, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Diabetes; Gestational; Fetal macrosomia; Pre-eclampsia; Pregnancy complications; Review; Systematic; Meta-analysis; GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; PREGNANCY; MELLITUS; HYPERGLYCEMIA; MANAGEMENT; WOMEN; TRIAL; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.diabres.2012.09.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness of gestational diabetes (GDM) treatment compared to usual antenatal care, in the prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, to assess the quality of the evidence to support GDM treatment according to GRADE guidelines. Methods: Fourteen electronic databases and reference lists of relevant literature were searched for articles published from inception to February, 2012. Controlled clinical trials comparing GDM treatment to usual antenatal care were included. Independent extraction of articles was done by two authors using predefined data fields. Results: Seven trials involving 3157 women were included. We found high quality evidence that treatment of GDM reduces macrosomia (RR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.65; NNT = 11.4) and large for gestational age birth (RR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.47-0.71; NNT = 12.2); moderate quality evidence that treatment reduces preeclampsia (RR = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46-0.81; NNT = 21.0) and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (RR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51-0.81; NNT = 18.1); and low quality evidence that treatment reduces shoulder dystocia (RR = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.76; NNT = 48.8). No statistically significant reduction was seen for caesarean section. No increase in small for gestational age or preterm birth was found. Conclusions: Treatment of GDM is effective in reducing macrosomia (high quality evidence), preeclampsia and shoulder dystocia. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 405
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
Treatments for gestational diabetes [J].
Alwan, N. ;
Tuffnell, D. J. ;
West, J. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (03)
[2]
[Anonymous], 2011, DIABETES CARE
[3]
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[4]
Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction [J].
Barker, David J. P. .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (02) :270-283
[5]
Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bellamy, Leanne ;
Casas, Juan-Pablo ;
Hingorani, Aroon D. ;
Williams, David J. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 335 (7627) :974-977
[6]
Treatment of women with an abnormal glucose challenge test (but a normal oral glucose tolerance test) decreases the prevalence of macrosomia [J].
Bevier, WC ;
Fischer, R ;
Jovanovic, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1999, 16 (06) :269-275
[7]
Clinical Outcomes of Pregnancies Complicated by Mild Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Differ by Combinations of Abnormal Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Values [J].
Black, Mary Helen ;
Sacks, David A. ;
Xiang, Anny H. ;
Lawrence, Jean M. .
DIABETES CARE, 2010, 33 (12) :2524-2530
[8]
Evaluating the therapeutic approach in pregnancies complicated by borderline glucose intolerance:: a randomized clinical trial [J].
Bonomo, M ;
Corica, D ;
Mion, E ;
Gonçalves, D ;
Motta, G ;
Merati, R ;
Ragusa, A ;
Morabito, A .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2005, 22 (11) :1536-1541
[9]
Low-glycemic index diets in the management of diabetes [J].
Brand-Miller, J ;
Hayne, S ;
Petocz, P ;
Colagiuri, S .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (08) :2261-2267
[10]
Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes [J].
Crowther, CA ;
Hiller, JE ;
Moss, JR ;
McPhee, AJ ;
Jeffries, WS ;
Robinson, JS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (24) :2477-2486