Bumps and bridges on the road to responsible sharing of clinical trial data

被引:20
作者
Berlin, Jesse A. [1 ]
Morris, Sandra [1 ]
Rockhold, Frank [2 ]
Askie, Lisa [3 ]
Ghersi, Davina [4 ]
Waldstreicher, Joanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[2] GlaxoSmithKline, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[3] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Sydney Med Sch, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
METAANALYSIS; CEFEPIME; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1177/1740774513514497
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Sharing data from clinical trials could assist with the advancement of science and medicine, potentially providing a better understanding of both the benefits and risks of medicines and other treatments. Sharing data also allows for questions to be addressed at the meta-analysis level that cannot be addressed within individual studies. Purpose In this article, we offer some practical recommendations that will allow researchers to readily combine datasets from different studies and sources, thereby enabling meta-analyses that could have significant impact on advancing medicine. Methods The authors relied on their collective experience in the conduct and reporting of clinical trials to define the areas of potential concern related to responsible sharing of clinical trial data. We conducted a review of the literature and engaged in an iterative consensus-building process. Results To further the goal of responsible sharing of clinical trial data, collaboration on a consistent set of data standards and methods across both industry and academia is sorely needed. Protection of participant privacy is a paramount principle. The additional questions of who maintains, funds, and oversees databases of participant-level data will be important to resolve. Requiring researchers to register their requests for participant-level data and to provide details of their intended research would allow others to evaluate the proposed research plan, consistent with the principles of science and transparency. Limitations The recommendations represent the views of the individual authors. We recognize that other approaches to data sharing that have been advocated are also based on sound ethical and scientific principles.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 12
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PRINC RESP CLIN TRIA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, LEAD ENG ALZH DIS
[3]  
Cancer Discovery, 2012, DAT SPHER SHAR CLIN
[4]   The Imperative to Share Clinical Study Reports: Recommendations from the Tamiflu Experience [J].
Doshi, Peter ;
Jefferson, Tom ;
Del Mar, Chris .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (04)
[5]   Open Clinical Trial Data for All? A View from Regulators [J].
Eichler, Hans-Georg ;
Abadie, Eric ;
Breckenridge, Alasdair ;
Leufkens, Hubert ;
Rasi, Guido .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (04)
[6]  
European Medicines Agency, 2011, QUEST ANSW REV ANG 2
[7]   Are clinical trial data shared sufficiently today? No [J].
Goldacre, Ben .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 347
[8]   Why we need easy access to all data from all clinical trials and how to accomplish it [J].
Gotzsche, Peter C. .
TRIALS, 2011, 12
[9]   Industry and drug regulators disagree on which data should remain confidential [J].
Hawkes, Nigel .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 347
[10]  
Institute of Medicine, 2013, STRAT RESP SHAR CLIN