Short-form activity measure for post-acute care

被引:89
作者
Haley, SM
Andres, PL
Coster, WJ
Kosinski, M
Ni, PS
Jette, AM
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Res & Training Ctr Measuring Rehabil Outcomes, Ctr Rehabil Effectiveness, Sargent Coll Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Qual Metr Inc, Lincoln, RI USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2004年 / 85卷 / 04期
关键词
activities of daily living; outcomes research; rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.098
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop a comprehensive set of short forms using item response theory (IRT) and item pooling procedures for the purpose of monitoring postacute care functional recovery. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Six postacute health care networks in the greater Boston area, including inpatient acute rehabilitation, transitional care units, home care, and outpatient services. Participants: A convenience sample of 485 adult volunteers who were Currently receiving skilled rehabilitation services. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: We developed a set of 6 short forms across 3 activity domains from new items and items from existing postacute care instruments. Results: Inpatient- and community-based short forms were developed for each of 3 activity domains: physical & movement, applied cognition, and personal care & instrumental. Items were selected for inclusion on the short forms to maximize content coverage and information value of items across the range of content and to minimize ceiling and floor effects. We were able to match the distribution of sample scores with very good item precision for I of the constructs (physical & movement): the other 2 domains (personal care & instrumental, applied cognition) were more challenging because of the variability in patient recovery and ceiling effects. Conclusions: ITR methods and item pooling procedures were valuable in developing paired sets of short-form instruments for inpatient and community rehabilitation that provided estimates of functioning along a common metric for use across postacute care settings.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 660
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Is patient-reported function reliable for monitoring postacute outcomes? [J].
Andres, PL ;
Haley, SM ;
Ni, PS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2003, 82 (08) :614-621
[2]  
ANDRESEN EM, 2000, ARCH PHYSICAL MED S2, V81, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, GUIDE UNIFORM DATA S
[4]  
[Anonymous], MEDICARES OASIS STAN
[5]  
Buchanan JL, 2003, HEALTH CARE FINANC R, V24, P45
[6]  
Cella D, 2000, MED CARE, V38, P66
[7]   The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures [J].
Cohen, ME ;
Marino, RJ .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (12) :S21-S29
[8]   Delicate balance between theory and practice - Health status assessment and item response theory [J].
Cook, KF ;
Monahan, PO ;
McHorney, CA .
MEDICAL CARE, 2003, 41 (05) :571-574
[9]   Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement - Personal core and instrumental activities domain [J].
Coster, WJ ;
Haley, SM ;
Andres, PL ;
Ludlow, LH ;
Bond, TLY ;
Ni, PS .
MEDICAL CARE, 2004, 42 (01) :62-72
[10]  
*DEP ED NAT I DIS, 1998, LONG RANG PLAN