Antihypertensive Efficacy of Hydrochlorothiazide vs Chlorthalidone Combined with Azilsartan Medoxomil

被引:73
作者
Bakris, George L. [1 ]
Sica, Domenic [2 ]
White, William B. [3 ]
Cushman, William C. [4 ]
Weber, Michael A. [5 ]
Handley, Alison [6 ]
Song, Eric [6 ]
Kupfer, Stuart [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Sch Med, Farmington, CT USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Coll Med, Memphis, TN USA
[5] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[6] Takeda Global Res & Dev Ctr Inc, Deerfield, IL USA
关键词
Angiotensin receptor blocker; Azilsartan medoxomil; Chlorthalidone; Hypertension; CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITOR; HYPERTENSION; OUTCOMES; RISK; PREVENTION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; AMLODIPINE; BLOCKER;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.05.023
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Chlorthalidone has proven efficacy to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, yet it is infrequently used in practice. This study provides a direct comparison of chlorthalidone with hydrochlorothiazide, each combined with the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil, on blood pressure reduction and control rates. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind, titrate-to-target blood pressure trial comparing the single-pill combination of azilsartan medoxomil and chlorthalidone versus co-administration of azilsartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide in participants with stage 2 primary hypertension. After 2 weeks of treatment with azilsartan medoxomil 40 mg alone, all participants also received 12.5 mg of diuretic for 4 weeks (up to week 6) and were titrated to 25 mg for another 4 weeks (up to week 10) if they failed to achieve target blood pressure. The primary end point was change in clinic systolic blood pressure. Target blood pressure was defined as clinic blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg for participants without diabetes or chronic kidney disease or <130/80 mm Hg for participants with diabetes or chronic kidney disease. RESULTS: The mean age of the 609 participants was 56.4 years, and the mean baseline clinic blood pressure was 164.6/95.4 mm Hg. The primary end point analysis at week 6 demonstrated a greater reduction of clinic systolic blood pressure for the chlorthalidone (-35.1 mm Hg) versus hydrochlorothiazide combination (-29.5 mm Hg) (mean difference, -5.6 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -8.3 to -2.9; P < .001). The mean difference in 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure at week 6 was -5.8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -8.4 to -3.2; P < .001), favoring the azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone group. The percentage of participants achieving target clinic blood pressure at week 6 was greater for the chlorthalidone versus hydrochlorothiazide combination (64.1% vs 45.9%, P < .001). Drug discontinuations due to adverse events were not statistically significantly different between groups (9.3% vs 7.3%, P = .38), and hypokalemia was uncommon in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Chlorthalidone combined with azilsartan medoxomil provides better blood pressure reduction and a higher likelihood of achieving blood pressure control than hydrochlorothiazide combined with azilsartan medoxomil. This benefit occurred without a difference in safety measurements. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. circle The American Journal of Medicine (2012) 125, 1229.e1-1229.e10
引用
收藏
页码:1229.e1 / 1229.e10
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1991, JAMA, V265, P3255
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, Am J Kidney Dis, V43, pS1, DOI DOI 10.1053/J.AJKD.2004.03.003
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, BMJ, V343, pd4891, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.D4891
  • [4] The Comparative Effects of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Olmesartan on Ambulatory and Clinic Blood Pressure
    Bakris, George L.
    Sica, Domenic
    Weber, Michael
    White, William B.
    Roberts, Andrew
    Perez, Alfonso
    Cao, Charlie
    Kupfer, Stuart
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2011, 13 (02) : 81 - 88
  • [5] Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-associated elevations in serum creatinine - Is this a cause for concern?
    Bakris, GL
    Weir, MR
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (05) : 685 - 693
  • [6] Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy
    Brenner, BM
    Cooper, ME
    de Zeeuw, D
    Keane, WF
    Mitch, WE
    Parving, HH
    Remuzzi, G
    Snapinn, SM
    Zhang, ZX
    Shahinfar, S
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (12) : 861 - 869
  • [7] Hydrochlorothiazide versus chlorthalidone evidence supporting their interchangeability
    Carter, BL
    Ernst, ME
    Cohen, JD
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2004, 43 (01) : 4 - 9
  • [8] Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
    Chobanian, AV
    Bakris, GL
    Black, HR
    Cushman, WC
    Green, LA
    Izzo, JL
    Jones, DW
    Materson, BJ
    Oparil, S
    Wright, JT
    Roccella, EJ
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) : 1206 - 1252
  • [9] US Trends in Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension, 1988-2008
    Egan, Brent M.
    Zhao, Yumin
    Axon, R. Neal
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (20): : 2043 - 2050
  • [10] Comparative antihypertensive effects of hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone on ambulatory and office blood pressure
    Ernst, ME
    Carter, BL
    Goerdt, CJ
    Steffensmeier, JJG
    Phillips, BB
    Zimmerman, MB
    Bergus, GR
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2006, 47 (03) : 352 - 358