Eye movements of young and older adults while reading with distraction

被引:48
作者
Kemper, S
McDowd, J
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Gerontol Ctr, Dole Human Dev Ctr 3090, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Ctr Aging, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
inhibition; reading with distraction; eye movements; distraction; inhibitory deficit theory;
D O I
10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.32
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The authors used eye-tracking technology to examine young and older adults' online performance in the reading in distraction paradigm. Participants read target sentences and answered comprehension questions following each sentence. In some sentences, single-word distracters were presented in either italic or red font. Distracters could be related or unrelated to the target text. Online measures, including probability of fixation, fixation duration, and number of fixations to distracting text, revealed no age differences in text processing. However, young adults did have an advantage over older adults in overall reading time and text comprehension. These results provide no support for an inhibition deficit account of age differences in the reading in distraction paradigm, but are consistent with J. Dywan and W. E. Murphy's (1996) suggestion that older adults are less able than the young to distinguish target and distracter information held in working memory.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 39
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   AGING, DISTRACTION, AND THE BENEFITS OF PREDICTABLE LOCATION [J].
CARLSON, MC ;
HASHER, L ;
CONNELLY, SL ;
ZACKS, RT .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1995, 10 (03) :427-436
[2]   AGE AND READING: THE IMPACT OF DISTRACTION [J].
CONNELLY, SL ;
HASHER, L ;
ZACKS, RT .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1991, 6 (04) :533-541
[3]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY AND READING [J].
DANEMAN, M ;
CARPENTER, PA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1980, 19 (04) :450-466
[4]   Aging and inhibitory control in text comprehension [J].
Dywan, J ;
Murphy, WE .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1996, 11 (02) :199-206
[5]   PROCESSING CONSEQUENCES OF PERCEPTUAL GROUPING IN SELECTIVE ATTENTION [J].
FARKAS, MS ;
HOYER, WJ .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY, 1980, 35 (02) :207-216
[6]  
Hasher L., 1988, PSYCHOL LEARN MOTIV, V22, P193, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60041-9, 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60041-9]
[7]  
HOYER WJ, 1982, AGING HUMAN VISUAL F, P245
[8]  
LANKFORD C, 2000, EYETR RES APPL S PAL
[9]  
MALTHAUP KS, 1998, 7 BIENN COGN AG C AT
[10]  
MITZNER T, 2002, UNPUB EFFECTS CONTEX