Bias in the Wagner-Nelson estimate of the fraction of drug absorbed

被引:19
作者
Wang, YB [1 ]
Nedelman, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Pharmaceut Coporat, Biostat & Stat Programming, E Hanover, NJ 07936 USA
关键词
Wagner-Nelson; fraction absorbed; absorption; estimation error; bias;
D O I
10.1023/A:1015195612726
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Purpose. To examine and quantify bias in the Wagner-Nelson estimate of the fraction of drug absorbed resulting from the estimation error of the elimination rate constant (k), measurement error of the drug concentration, and the truncation error in the area under the curve. Methods. Bias in the Wagner-Nelson estimate was derived as a function of post-dosing time (t), k, ratio of absorption rate constant to k (r), and the coefficient of variation for estimates of k (CVk), or CVc for the observed concentration, by assuming a one-compartment model and using an independent estimate of k. The derived functions were used for evaluating the bias with r = 0.5, 3, or 6; k = 0.1 or 0.2; CVc = 0.2 or 0.4; and CVk =0.2 or 0.4; for t = 0 to 30 or 60. Results. Estimation error of k resulted in an upward bias in the Wagner-Nelson estimate that could lead to the estimate of the fraction absorbed being greater than unity. The bias resulting from the estimation error of k inflates the fraction of absorption vs. time profiles mainly in the early post-dosing period. The magnitude of the bias in the Wagner-Nelson estimate resulting from estimation error of k was mainly determined by CVk. The bias in the Wagner-Nelson estimate resulting from to estimation error in k can be dramatically reduced by use of the mean of several independent estimates of k, as in studies for development of an in vivo-in vitro correlation. The truncation error in the area under the curve can introduce a negative bias in the Wagner-Nelson estimate. This can partially offset the bias resulting from estimation error of k in the early post-dosing period. Measurement error of concentration does not introduce bias in the Wagner-Nelson estimate. Conclusions. Estimation error of k results in an upward bias in the Wagner-Nelson estimate, mainly in the early drug absorption phase. The truncation error in AUC can result in a downward bias, which may partially offset the upward bias due to estimation error of k in the early absorption phase. Measurement error of concentration does not introduce bias. The joint effect of estimation error of k and truncation error in AUC can result in a non-monotonic fraction-of-drug-absorbed-vs-time profile. However, only estimation error of k can lead to the Wagner-Nelson estimate of fraction of drug absorbed greater than unity.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 476
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   INVITRO INVIVO CORRELATION OF PROLONGED RELEASE DOSAGE FORMS CONTAINING DILTIAZEM HCL [J].
CARAMELLA, C ;
FERRARI, F ;
BONFERONI, MC ;
SANGALLI, ME ;
DIVALSERRA, MD ;
FELETTI, F ;
GALMOZZI, MR .
BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION, 1993, 14 (02) :143-160
[2]   Modeling in frequency domain used for assessment of in vivo dissolution profile [J].
Durisova, M ;
Dedik, L .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1997, 14 (07) :860-864
[3]   In vitro-in vivo correlation and comparative bioavailablity of vincamine in prolonged-release preparations [J].
Emara, LH ;
El-Menshawi, BS ;
Estefan, MY .
DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY, 2000, 26 (03) :243-251
[4]   MULTIPLE-LAYER, DIRECT-COMPRESSION, CONTROLLED-RELEASE SYSTEM - IN-VITRO AND IN-VIVO EVALUATION [J].
FASSIHI, RA ;
RITSCHEL, WA .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1993, 82 (07) :750-754
[5]  
FDA, 1997, EXT REL OR DOS FORMS
[6]  
GIBALDI M, 1975, PHARMACOKINETICS, P149
[7]   NEW EVALUATION METHOD FOR IN-VITRO IN-VIVO CORRELATION OF ENTERIC-COATED MULTIPLE-UNIT DOSAGE FORMS [J].
HAYASHI, T ;
OGURA, T ;
TAKAGISHI, Y .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1995, 12 (09) :1333-1337
[8]  
Mahmood I, 1998, Am J Ther, V5, P377, DOI 10.1097/00045391-199811000-00004
[9]  
Mallick S, 2000, Acta Pol Pharm, V57, P175
[10]   The relative bioavailability and in vivo in vitro correlations for four marketed carbamazepine tablets [J].
Meyer, MC ;
Straughn, AB ;
Mhatre, RM ;
Shah, VP ;
Williams, RL ;
Lesko, LJ .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1998, 15 (11) :1787-1791