Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics

被引:467
作者
Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe [1 ]
Walz, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Ecol Urban & Reg Dev, D-01217 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Landscape metrics; Service providing area (SPA); Service benefiting area (SBA); Service connecting area (SCA); Landscape structure; Ecosystem services; Landscape services; Sparial characteristics; EFFECTIVE MESH SIZE; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; VALUATION; PAYMENTS; INDEX; CLASSIFICATION; CHALLENGES; ELEMENTS; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The ecosystem services approach is an established framework for the balanced evaluation of ecological, economic and social landscape resources. It promotes functional synergies (win-win situations) as well as trade-offs among various benefits resulting from ecosystem processes. Spatial aspects of heterogeneity and configuration play a major role in maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services and hence in human wellbeing. Cultural artifacts also contribute to landscape functionality. Because of the underlying areal aspects, an additional term, landscape service has been proposed and is increasingly used (Termorshuizen and Opdam. 2009). We take a particular interest in spatial aspects of this framework and the optimization of trade-offs between landscape services. Firstly, spatial heterogeneity is assessed by means of landscape metrics computed as indicators for landscape services. Landscape heterogeneity is a key measure of biodiversity and contributes to several valuable functions. Habitat connectivity and other measures of landscape structure are also essential criteria for the behavior of metapopulations and for recreational value. Secondly, service providing areas (SPAs) are discussed as the areal basis for service provision. Similarly, service benefiting areas (SBAs) and connecting areas (SCAs) for the transfer of matter, energy and organisms between them are investigated. Place-based assessment addresses such areas. We thus show possibilities for estimating and evaluating landscape units. Thirdly, the landscape consists of the natural environment, artifacts from past human use, current human activity and even social thinking. The landscape services approach in a wider sense allows us to take social/cultural services better into account because they depend strongly on heritage assets, structural characteristics, historical conditions end even cultural specifics; which can hardly be subsumed to ecosystems. Place-based assessment is an appropriate solution for combining several spatial categories. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 88
页数:9
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Adam K., 1987, BEWERTUNGSGRUNDLAGEN
  • [2] Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities
    Anderson, Barbara J.
    Armsworth, Paul R.
    Eigenbrod, Felix
    Thomas, Chris D.
    Gillings, Simon
    Heinemeyer, Andreas
    Roy, David B.
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2009, 46 (04) : 888 - 896
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, EC EC BIOD EC EC FDN
  • [5] Bastian O., 1991, KOLOGISCHEN BEWERTUN, P219
  • [6] Bastian O., 1999, ANAL OKOLOGISCHE BEW, P564
  • [7] Bastian O., 2002, NATURRAUMEINHEITEN L
  • [8] Indicators of landscape function: comparing patchiness metrics using remotely-sensed data from rangelands
    Bastin, Gary N.
    Ludwig, John A.
    Eager, Robert W.
    Chewings, Vanessa H.
    Liedloff, Adam C.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2002, 1 (04) : 247 - 260
  • [9] The role of the spatial dimension within the framework of sustainable landscapes and natural capital
    Blaschke, T
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2006, 75 (3-4) : 198 - 226
  • [10] Boyd J., 2006, What are ecosystem services?