Spatial heterogeneity of ports in the global maritime network detected by weighted ego network analysis

被引:79
作者
Liu, Chengliang [1 ]
Wang, Jiaqi [2 ]
Zhang, Hong [3 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Sch Urban & Reg Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Univ, Fac Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Fac Geosci & Environm Engn, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Global maritime network; spatial heterogeneity; hierarchical structure; weighted average centrality rank; weighted ego network analysis; COMPLEX NETWORK; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; SHIPPING NETWORK; AIRPORT NETWORK; SELF-SIMILARITY; RAILWAY NETWORK; CONTAINER FLOWS; ROAD NETWORKS; CENTRALITY; CHINA;
D O I
10.1080/03088839.2017.1345019
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
More extensive attention has been paid to the heterogeneity of maritime transport network in topological rather than in spatial aspects. However, the importance of links and the roles of neighbors of a node has been ignored if not all. To fill this gap, this article introduced the approach of weighted ego network analysis (WENA) to visualize the spatial heterogeneity of the maritime network at global and local levels. The topological connectivity graph of the global marine network was derived, and its structural properties were analyzed. It is found out that the values of the degree of ports follow power-law distribution, which indicates that the global marine network is scale-free, that is, there are few well-connected ports and a majority of less connected ports. The spatial disparities of the network can be described by a core-periphery pattern. In global, most of the hubs or ports with extremely high values of degree locate in the big-three maritime regions including Far East, North America, and West Europe. Along the peripheral belts of the three regions, there are lots of less connected small ports. A different hierarchical structure of six continents was captured by WENA. It is found that Europe, Asia, North America, and Africa showcase a pyramid-shaped hierarchical structure with a scale-free feature similar to the entire network, while South America and Oceania exhibit the fusiform hierarchy like small-world networks. It is proposed that such spatial inequality and heterogeneity were caused by the geographical environments such as the hub-and-spoke organization, the embedded trade pattern, and the proximity of location. These findings help us to understand the characteristics of the international trade pattern and shed light on the strategies of development for the industry stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 104
页数:16
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Alphaliner, 2014, EV CARR FLEETS
[2]  
Angeloudis P., 2013, Risk Management in Port Operations, Logistics and Supply Chain Security, P129
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, GEOGRAPHY TRANSPORT
[4]   Analysis of the airport network of India as a complex weighted network [J].
Bagler, Ganesh .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2008, 387 (12) :2972-2980
[5]   Emergence of scaling in random networks [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Albert, R .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :509-512
[6]   Betweenness centrality in large complex networks [J].
Barthélemy, M .
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2004, 38 (02) :163-168
[7]   Network analysis of container barge transport in the port of Antwerp by means of simulation [J].
Caris, A. ;
Macharis, C. ;
Janssens, G. K. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 19 (01) :125-133
[8]  
De Benedictis L, 2011, TRADE IMPACT OF EUROPEAN UNION PREFERENTIAL POLICIES: AN ANALYSIS THROUGH GRAVITY MODELS, P55, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-16564-1_4
[9]  
Deplano G., 2009, J TRANSP LAND USE, V2, P39, DOI [10.5198/jtlu.v2i3.14, DOI 10.5198/JTLU.V2I3.14]
[10]  
Ducruet C, 2016, MARITIME NETWORKS SP