Substandard and counterfeit medicines: a systematic review of the literature

被引:155
作者
Almuzaini, Tariq [1 ]
Choonara, Imti [1 ]
Sammons, Helen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Derbyshire Childrens Hosp, Acad Div Child Hlth, Derby, England
关键词
ANTIMALARIAL-DRUGS; QUALITY; MALARIA;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002923
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objective: To explore the evidence available of poor-quality (counterfeit and substandard) medicines in the literature. Design: Systematic review. Data sources: Databases used were EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, including articles published till January 2013. Eligibility criteria: Prevalence studies containing original data. WHO definitions (1992) used for counterfeit and substandard medicines. Study appraisal and synthesis: Two reviewers independently scored study methodology against recommendations from the MEDQUARG Checklist. Studies were classified according to the World Bank classification of countries by income. Data extraction: Data extracted: place of study; type of drugs sampled; sample size; percentage of substandard/counterfeit medicines; formulations included; origin of the drugs; chemical analysis and stated issues of counterfeit/substandard medicines. Results: 44 prevalence studies were identified, 15 had good methodological quality. They were conducted in 25 different countries; the majority were in low-income countries (11) and/or lower middle-income countries (10). The median prevalence of substandard/counterfeit medicines was 28.5% (range 11-48%). Only two studies differentiated between substandard and counterfeit medicines. Prevalence data were limited to antimicrobial drugs (all 15 studies). 13 studies involved antimalarials, 6 antibiotics and 2 other medications. The majority of studies (93%) contained samples with inadequate amounts of active ingredients. The prevalence of substandard/counterfeit antimicrobials was significantly higher when purchased from unlicensed outlets (p<0.000; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.32). No individual data about the prevalence in upper middle-income countries and high-income countries were available. Limitations: Studies with strong methodology were few. The majority did not differentiate between substandard and counterfeit medicines. Most studies assessed only a single therapeutic class of antimicrobials. Conclusions: The prevalence of poor-quality antimicrobial medicines is widespread throughout Africa and Asia in lower income countries and lower middle-income countries. The main problem identified was inadequate amounts of the active ingredients.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
Abdoulaye I, 2006, Med Trop (Mars), V66, P573
[2]
[Anonymous], 2012, SUBST SPUR FALS LAB
[3]
[Anonymous], UN DRUGS CRIM OFF WO
[4]
[Anonymous], REP EU CUST ENF INT
[5]
[Anonymous], COMFS201201DCO04 INT
[6]
[Anonymous], SURV QUAL SEL ANT ME
[7]
[Anonymous], WHOEMPQSM20111
[8]
[Anonymous], WHAT AR SUBST MED
[9]
[Anonymous], 1999, WHOEDMQSM993
[10]
[Anonymous], 2012, NEW GLOB MECH COMB S