Geolocation and voting: Candidate-voter distance effects on party choice in the 2010 UK general election in England

被引:64
作者
Arzheimer, Kai [1 ]
Evans, Jocelyn [2 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, Lancs, England
关键词
Voting; England; Spatial locations; Candidates; Incumbency; Conditional logit; INCUMBENCY ADVANTAGE; CONSTITUENCY SERVICE; PERSONAL VOTE; PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS; HOME STATE; PARLIAMENT; LOCALISM; MEMBERS; FRIENDS; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.04.006
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The effect of geographical distance between candidate and voter on vote-likelihood in the UK is essentially untested. In systems where constituency representatives vie for local inhabitants' support in elections, candidates living closer to a voter would be expected to have a greater probability of receiving that individual's support, other things being equal. In this paper, we present a first test of this concept using constituency data (specifically, notice of poll address data) from the British General Election of 2010 and the British Election Survey, together with geographical data from Ordnance Survey and Royal Mail, to test the hypothesis that candidate distance matters in voters' choice of candidate. Using a conditional logit model, we find that the distance between voter and candidates from the three main parties (Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat) matters in English constituencies, even when controlling for strong predictors of vote choice, such as party feeling and incumbency advantage. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 310
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]  
Cowley P., 2011, EL PUBL OP PART EPOP
[12]   SUBURBIA AND VOTING BEHAVIOR IN LONDON METROPOLITAN AREA [J].
COX, KR .
ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 1968, 58 (01) :111-127
[13]  
Crewe I., 1985, REPRESENTATIVES PEOP, P44
[14]  
Curtice J, 1995, SPATIAL AND CONTEXTUAL MODELS IN POLITICAL RESEARCH, P195
[15]   Continuous campaigning and electoral outcomes: The Liberal Democrats in Bath [J].
Cutts, D .
POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2006, 25 (01) :72-88
[16]  
Denver D., 1988, CANDIDATE SELECTION, P47
[17]  
Denver D., 1998, BRIT ELECTIONS PARTI, P171
[18]   The variable incumbency advantage: New voters, redistricting, and the personal vote [J].
Desposato, SW ;
Petrocik, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 47 (01) :18-32
[19]   Selecting the 'Right Sort': Patterns of Political Recruitment in British By-elections [J].
Evans, Elizabeth .
PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, 2012, 65 (01) :195-213
[20]   The Effectiveness of Local Party Campaigns in 2005: Combining Evidence from Campaign Spending and Agent Survey Data [J].
Fieldhouse, Edward ;
Cutts, David .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 39 :367-388