Use of protozoa and metazoa for decreasing sludge production in aerobic wastewater treatment

被引:97
作者
Lee, NM [1 ]
Welander, T [1 ]
机构
[1] ANOX AB,S-22370 LUND,SWEDEN
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00143465
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
A new approach to decreasing sludge production in aerobic biological wastewater treatment involving use of protozoa and metazoa was tested. The dissolved organics in the two synthetic wastewaters (based on acetic acid and methanol, respectively) tested were decomposed to >90% and the biomass production was decreased by 60-80%. The total sludge yield, expressed as total suspended solids per gram chemical oxygen demand removed, was 0.17 g TSS/g COD in the system fed acetic acid, whereas it was 0.05 g TSS/g COD in the system fed methanol. The explanation for this difference was that in the system fed methanol, dispersed bacteria were obtained that were easily grazed by the protozoa and metazoa in the predator stage. In the system fed acetic acid, the bacteria formed zoogloeal flocs, which protected them from grazing in the predator stage. With both carbon sources a significant release of nitrate (> 7 mg N/l) and of phosphate (> 2.5 mg P/l) was observed in the effluent.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 434
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
APHA AWWA WPCF, 1985, STAND METH EX WAT WA, P537
[2]  
Curds CR, 1992, PROTOZOA WATER IND
[3]  
Donner J., 1966, ROTIFERS
[4]  
Fenchel T., 1986, Progress in Protistology, V1, P65
[5]   GRAZING BY PROTOZOA AS SELECTION FACTOR FOR ACTIVATED-SLUDGE BACTERIA [J].
GUDE, H .
MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 1979, 5 (03) :225-237
[6]  
Jenkins D., 1993, MANUAL CAUSES CONTRO, V2nd
[7]   INFLUENCE OF PREDATORS ON NITRIFICATION IN AEROBIC BIOFILM PROCESSES [J].
LEE, NM ;
WELANDER, T .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 29 (07) :355-363
[8]  
LEE NM, 1996, IN PRESS WATER RES
[9]  
Patterson D.J., 1992, Free-living freshwater protozoa: a colour guide
[10]   Effects of protozoa on carbon mineralization in activated sludge [J].
Ratsak, CH ;
Maarsen, KA ;
Kooijman, SALM .
WATER RESEARCH, 1996, 30 (01) :1-12