Evolution of measles elimination strategies in the United States

被引:48
作者
Hinman, AR
Orenstein, WA
Papania, MJ
机构
[1] Task Force Child Survival & Dev, Decatur, GA 30030 USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Immunizat Program, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/377694
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
There have been 3 efforts to eliminate measles from the United States since the introduction of measles vaccine in 1963. To date, 10 major lessons have been learned from elimination efforts. First, elimination requires very high vaccination-coverage levels by age 2 years. Second, school immunization requirements ensure high coverage rates among schoolchildren. Third, a second dose of measles vaccine is needed to achieve satisfactory levels of immunity. Fourth, school immunization requirements can also ensure delivery of a second dose. Fifth, coverage assessment is crucial. Sixth, measles surveillance is critical for developing, evaluating, and refining elimination strategies. Seventh, surveillance requires laboratory backup to confirm a diagnosis. Eighth, tracking measles virus genotypes is critical to determining if an endemic strain is circulating. Ninth, once endemic transmission has been interrupted, internationally imported measles cases will continue and will cause small outbreaks. Tenth, collaborative efforts with other countries are essential to reduce imported measles cases.
引用
收藏
页码:S17 / S22
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   DIRECTLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIOUS-DISEASES - CONTROL BY VACCINATION [J].
ANDERSON, RM ;
MAY, RM .
SCIENCE, 1982, 215 (4536) :1053-1060
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
BART KJ, 1991, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V266, P1547
[4]   THE IMMUNIZATION OF CHILDREN ENROLLED IN THE SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTAL FOOD PROGRAM FOR WOMEN, INFANTS, AND CHILDREN (WIC) - THE IMPACT OF DIFFERENT STRATEGIES [J].
BIRKHEAD, GS ;
LEBARON, CW ;
PARSONS, P ;
GRABAU, JC ;
BARRGALE, L ;
FUHRMAN, J ;
BROOKS, S ;
ROSENTHAL, J ;
HADLER, SC ;
MORSE, DL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (04) :312-316
[5]  
*CDC, 1982, 11 CDC US PHS
[6]   EPIDEMIOLOGIC RATIONALE FOR FAILURE TO ERADICATE MEASLES IN UNITED STATES [J].
CONRAD, JL ;
WALLACE, R ;
WITTE, JJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE NATIONS HEALTH, 1971, 61 (11) :2304-&
[7]   Measles eradication in the Americas: Progress to date [J].
de Quadros, CA ;
Izurieta, H ;
Venczel, L ;
Carrasco, P .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 189 :S227-S235
[8]  
De Serres G, 2000, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V151, P1039, DOI 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010145
[9]   The impact of computer-generated messages on childhood immunization coverage [J].
Dini, EF ;
Linkins, RW ;
Sigafoos, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 18 (02) :132-139
[10]   Has surveillance been adequate to detect endemic measles in the United States? [J].
Harpaz, R ;
Papania, MJ ;
McCauley, MM ;
Redd, SB .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 189 :S191-S195