Disparity in prenatal care in Europe

被引:29
作者
Delvaux, T
Buekens, P
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Social Med, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Free Univ Brussels, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Maternal & Child Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
prenatal care; health services utilisation; health services accessibility;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00237-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of the study was to compare prenatal care attendance in European Union countries, Hungary and Norway. Study Design: We analysed live births or deliveries from national registers in five countries, national surveys in five countries, and regional register or surveys in three countries. Results: The frequency of no prenatal care was lower than 0.5% in 10 countries, 0.9% in Hungary, 2.1% in Greece and 2.6% in Portugal. Late prenatal care varied from 3.1% in Finland to 29.2% in Ireland. Late care among women with parity 4 and more varied from 7.7% in Finland to 41.5% in Hungary. Among women under 20 years old, late care varied from 11.8% in Finland to 39.5% in Portugal. The median number of prenatal visits varied from seven in Greece to 14 in Finland. Conclusion: Prenatal care attendance varies widely among European countries. Late attendance is frequent in many countries. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 190
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Aberg A, 1992, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, V8 Suppl 1, P20
[2]   VARIATIONS IN PROVISION AND UPTAKE OF ANTENATAL CARE [J].
BUEKENS, P .
BAILLIERES CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1990, 4 (01) :187-205
[3]   A COMPARISON OF PRENATAL-CARE USE IN THE UNITED-STATES AND EUROPE [J].
BUEKENS, P ;
KOTELCHUCK, M ;
BLONDEL, B ;
KRISTENSEN, FB ;
CHEN, JH ;
MASUYSTROOBANT, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1993, 83 (01) :31-36
[4]  
*DEP HLTH HUM SERV, 1989, CAR OUR FUT CONT PRE, P47
[5]   Trends in the percentage of women who received no prenatal care in the United States, 1980-1992: Contributions of the demographic and risk effects [J].
ElamEvans, LD ;
Adams, MA ;
Gargiullo, PM ;
Kiely, JL ;
Marks, JS .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (04) :575-580
[6]   AMOUNT OF ANTENATAL CARE AND INFANT OUTCOME [J].
GISSLER, M ;
HEMMINKI, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1994, 56 (01) :9-14
[7]   QUANTITY AND TARGETING OF ANTENATAL CARE IN FINLAND [J].
HEMMINKI, E ;
GISSLER, M .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 72 (01) :24-30
[8]   Knowledge of prenatal care among non-pregnant women: An explanation for early attendance [J].
Hemminki, E ;
Sihvo, S .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (03) :152-154
[9]  
LIBERATOS P, 1991, REPROD PERINATAL EPI, P79
[10]   Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women - A randomized controlled trial [J].
McDuffie, RS ;
Beck, A ;
Bischoff, K ;
Cross, J ;
Orleans, M .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (11) :847-851