Exploratory Factor Analysis With Small Sample Sizes

被引:708
作者
de Winter, J. C. F. [1 ]
Dodou, D. [1 ]
Wieringa, P. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept BioMech Engn, Fac Mech Maritime & Mat Engn, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands
关键词
MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; MONTE-CARLO; IMPROPER SOLUTIONS; FIT INDEXES; NUMBER; MODEL; VARIABLES; RECOVERY; ERROR; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1080/00273170902794206
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is generally regarded as a technique for large sample sizes (N), with N = 50 as a reasonable absolute minimum. This study offers a comprehensive overview of the conditions in which EFA can yield good quality results for N below 50. Simulations were carried out to estimate the minimum required N for different levels of loadings (), number of factors (f), and number of variables (p) and to examine the extent to which a small N solution can sustain the presence of small distortions such as interfactor correlations, model error, secondary loadings, unequal loadings, and unequal p/f. Factor recovery was assessed in terms of pattern congruence coefficients, factor score correlations, Heywood cases, and the gap size between eigenvalues. A subsampling study was also conducted on a psychological dataset of individuals who filled in a Big Five Inventory via the Internet. Results showed that when data are well conditioned (i.e., high , low f, high p), EFA can yield reliable results for N well below 50, even in the presence of small distortions. Such conditions may be uncommon but should certainly not be ruled out in behavioral research data.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 181
页数:35
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   A MONTE-CARLO COMPARISON OF FACTOR ANALYTIC METHODS [J].
ACITO, F ;
ANDERSON, RD .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1980, 17 (02) :228-236
[2]   RELATION OF SAMPLE-SIZE TO NUMBER OF VARIABLES IN USING FACTOR-ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES [J].
ALEAMONI, LM .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1976, 36 (04) :879-883
[3]   THE EFFECT OF SAMPLING ERROR ON CONVERGENCE, IMPROPER SOLUTIONS, AND GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDEXES FOR MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1984, 49 (02) :155-173
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Educational and Psychological Measurement, DOI [10.1177/0013164404272507, DOI 10.1177/0013164404272507]
[5]   AN EMPIRICAL-TEST OF THE UTILITY OF THE OBSERVATIONS-TO-VARIABLES RATIO IN FACTOR AND COMPONENTS-ANALYSIS [J].
ARRINDELL, WA ;
VANDERENDE, J .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1985, 9 (02) :165-178
[6]   The Chemical Odor Sensitivity Scale:: Reliability and validity of a screening instrument for idiopathic environmental intolerance [J].
Bailer, Josef ;
Witthoft, M. ;
Rist, F. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2006, 61 (01) :71-79
[7]   SAMPLE-SIZE EFFECTS ON CHI-SQUARE AND OTHER STATISTICS USED IN EVALUATING CAUSAL-MODELS [J].
BEARDEN, WO ;
SHARMA, S ;
TEEL, JE .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1982, 19 (04) :425-430
[8]   Simulation study on fit indexes in CFA based on data with slierhtly distorted simple structure [J].
Beauducel, A ;
Wittmann, WW .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2005, 12 (01) :41-75
[9]  
Beauducel A., 2001, Methods of Psychological Research Online, V6, P69
[10]   Rites, Wrongs, and Gold in Model Testing [J].
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2000, 7 (01) :82-91