Doubling epirubicin dose intensity (100 mg/m(2) versus 50 mg/m(2)) in the FEC regimen significantly increases response rates. An international randomised phase III study in metastatic breast cancer

被引:73
作者
Brufman, G
Colajori, E
Ghilezan, N
Lassus, M
Martoni, A
Perevodchikova, N
Tosello, C
Viaro, D
Zielinski, C
Krainer, M
Salzer, H
Schuller, J
Dittrich, C
Scheithauer, W
Zamagni, C
Ambrosini, G
Colucci, G
Gentilini, P
Zaniboni, A
Pacini, P
Bianco, R
Mustacchi, G
DAprile, M
DeMatteis, A
Oliveira, C
Jordaan, J
Gudgeon, A
VanZyl, J
Rakowsky, E
Inbar, M
Rath, P
Cohen, Y
Shani, A
Fried, G
Hegg, R
Neto, AB
Bader, G
Braga, RF
Vitoc, C
Puerto, VML
Valle, AE
Salazar, JD
Sanchez, JC
Villela, GM
Fountzilas, G
机构
[1] HADASSAH MED CTR EIN KAREM, JERUSALEM, ISRAEL
[2] PHARMACIA & UPJOHN INC, MILAN, ITALY
[3] INST ONCOL, CLUJ NAPOCA, ROMANIA
[4] OSPED ST ORSOLA MALPIGHI, BOLOGNA, ITALY
[5] ACAD MED SCI, ONCOL SCI CTR, MOSCOW, RUSSIA
[6] PRACA AMADEU AMARAL, SAO PAULO, BRAZIL
[7] UNIV VIENNA, DEPT MED 2, A-1010 VIENNA, AUSTRIA
[8] UNIV VIENNA, DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL 1, A-1010 VIENNA, AUSTRIA
[9] KRANKENHAUS RUDOLFSTIFTUNG, DEPT MED 1, VIENNA, AUSTRIA
[10] UNIV VIENNA, CLIN CHEMOTHERAPY, A-1010 VIENNA, AUSTRIA
[11] UNIV VIENNA, CLIN GASTROENTEROL & HEPATOL CLIN 2, A-1010 VIENNA, AUSTRIA
[12] OSPED S CHIARA, Trento, ITALY
[13] IST ONCOL, BARI, ITALY
[14] OSPED GB MORGANI, FORLI, ITALY
[15] SPEDALI CIVIL BRESCIA, I-25125 BRESCIA, ITALY
[16] POLICLIN CAREGGI, FLORENCE, ITALY
[17] NUOVO POLICLIN CLIN MED, NAPLES, ITALY
[18] CTR ONCOL, TRIESTE, ITALY
[19] OSPED S MARIA GORETTI, LATINA, ITALY
[20] IST NAZL TUMORI, NAPLES, ITALY
[21] IST PORTUGUES ONCOL & COIMBRA, COIMBRA, PORTUGAL
[22] UNIV NATAL, ADDINGTON HOSP, ZA-4001 DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA
[23] GROOTE SCHUUR HOSP, ZA-7925 CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA
[24] UNIV STELLENBOSCH, CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA
[25] BEILINSON MED CTR, IL-49100 PETAH TIQWA, ISRAEL
[26] ICHILOV HOSP, TEL AVIV, ISRAEL
[27] CHAIM SHEBA MED CTR, RAMAT GAN, ISRAEL
[28] SOROKA MED CTR, IL-84101 BEER SHEVA, ISRAEL
[29] KAPLAN HOSP, IL-76100 REHOVOT, ISRAEL
[30] HADASSAH MED CTR, IL-91120 JERUSALEM, ISRAEL
[31] RAMBAM MED CTR, HAIFA, ISRAEL
[32] PUC, HOSP SAO LUCAS, PORTO ALEGRE, RS, BRAZIL
[33] HOSP CLIN R ENEAS CARVALHO AGUIAR, SAO PAULO, BRAZIL
[34] PRACA AMADEU AMARAL, SAO PAULO, BRAZIL
[35] IMSS, NATL MED CTR, ONCOL HOSP, MEXICO CITY, DF, MEXICO
[36] HOSP REG 20 NOVIEMBRE, ISSSTE, MEXICO CITY, DF, MEXICO
[37] NATL CANC INST, TLALPAN, MEXICO
[38] HOSP GEN OCCIDENTE SEGURO SOCIAL, JALISCO, MEXICO
[39] IMSS, CTR MED OCCIDENTE, GUADALAJARA, JALISCO, MEXICO
[40] UNIV HOSP, AHEPA, THESSALONIKI, GREECE
[41] RUSSIAN ACAD MED SCI, ONCOL SCI CTR, MOSCOW, RUSSIA
关键词
dose intensification; epirubicin; metastatic breast cancer;
D O I
10.1023/A:1008295427877
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: A phase III study was performed in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to evaluate the effect on response rate and survival of a doubling of the epirubicin dose intensity. Patients and methods: Four hundred fifty-six patients were randomised to receive either epirubicin 100 mg/m(2) or 50 mg/m(2) in combination with 5-FU (500 mg/m(2)) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m(2)) (FEC 100 vs. FEC 50) i.v., every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles (eight in case of CR). Results: Of 456 patients, 390 were evaluable for efficacy. Objective response (CR + PR) was seen in 57% (FEC 100) vs. 41% (FEC 50) of the evaluable patients (P = 0.003). The CR rate was higher in the FEC 100 arm (12% vs. 7%, P = 0.07). FEC 100 produced significantly higher response rates in patients with visceral localisation (50% vs. 34%, P = 0.011) and in patients with more than two metastatic organ sites (64% vs. 37%, P = 0.001). Median time to progression (7.6 vs. 7 months) and overall survival (18 months vs. 17 months) were similar. Myelosuppression was the principal toxic effect, with grade IV neutropenia observed in 57% of the patients treated with FEC 100 vs. 9% of those on FEC 50. Grade IV infection or febrile neutropenia were observed in 8% (FEC 100) vs. 0.4% (FEC 50), but the incidence of septic death was the same in the two arms (two patients each). Cardiac toxicity was similar in the two treatment groups, with 5% vs. 3% of the patients taken off study due to cardiac events, primarily due to a decline in LVEF. Only three patients (two in FEC 100) experienced congestive heart failure. Conclusion: This trial shows that FEC with epirubicin at 100 mg/m(2) can be administered for repeated cycles without bone marrow support with increased, though acceptable, toxicity and with a significant increase of antitumor effect (especially in visceral and/or high-burden disease), but no increased survival.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 162
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS CHEMOIMMUNOTHERAPY (CAF V CAFVP V CMF EACH +/- MER) FOR METASTATIC CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST - A CALGB STUDY
    AISNER, J
    WEINBERG, V
    PERLOFF, M
    WEISS, R
    PERRY, M
    KORZUN, A
    GINSBERG, S
    HOLLAND, JF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 5 (10) : 1523 - 1533
  • [2] A PHASE-II STUDY OF HIGH-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, THIOTEPA, AND CARBOPLATIN WITH AUTOLOGOUS MARROW SUPPORT IN WOMEN WITH MEASURABLE ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER RESPONDING TO STANDARD-DOSE THERAPY
    ANTMAN, K
    AYASH, L
    ELIAS, A
    WHEELER, C
    HUNT, M
    EDER, JP
    TEICHER, BA
    CRITCHLOW, J
    BIBBO, J
    SCHNIPPER, LE
    FREI, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1992, 10 (01) : 102 - 110
  • [3] Dose-response relationship of epirubicin in the treatment of postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer: A randomized study of epirubicin at four different dose levels performed by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group
    Bastholt, L
    Dalmark, M
    Gjedde, SB
    Pfeiffer, P
    Pedersen, D
    Sandberg, E
    Kjaer, M
    Mouridsen, HT
    Rose, C
    Nielsen, OS
    Jakobsen, P
    Bentzen, SM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (04) : 1146 - 1155
  • [4] BLACKSTEIN M, 1988, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, P87
  • [5] BONNETERRE J, 1991, J CLIN ONCOL, V9, P305
  • [6] BONNETERRE J, 1996, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V15, P82
  • [7] BRAMBILLA C, 1986, CANCER TREAT REP, V70, P261
  • [8] BULL JM, 1978, CANCER, V41, P1649, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197805)41:5<1649::AID-CNCR2820410501>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-J
  • [10] CALERO F, 1992, European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, V13, P83