Geophysical validation of SCIAMACHY Limb Ozone Profiles

被引:22
作者
Brinksma, EJ
Bracher, A
Lolkema, DE
Segers, AJ
Boyd, IS
Bramstedt, K
Claude, H
Godin-Beekmann, S
Hansen, G
Kopp, G
Leblanc, T
McDermid, IS
Meijer, YJ
Nakane, H
Parrish, A
von Savigny, C
Stebel, K
Swart, DPJ
Taha, G
Piters, AJM
机构
[1] KNMI, NL-3730 AE De Bilt, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bremen, Inst Environm Phys IFE, D-28334 Bremen, Germany
[3] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Bilthoven, Netherlands
[4] NIWA, Environm Res Inst, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 USA
[5] Meteorol Observat, Deutsch Wetterdienst, D-82383 Hohenpeissenberg, Germany
[6] CNRS, Serv Aeron, Inst Pierre Simon Lapl, F-75252 Paris 05, France
[7] Norwegian Inst Air Res, Polar Environm Ctr, Tromso, Norway
[8] Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, IMK, Karlsruhe, Germany
[9] Univ Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
[10] NASA, JPL, Wrightwood, CA USA
[11] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Div Atmospher Environm, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
[12] Univ Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[13] Sci Applicat Int Corp, Hampton, VA USA
[14] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
关键词
D O I
10.5194/acp-6-197-2006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We discuss the quality of the two available SCIA-MACHY limb ozone profile products. They were retrieved with the University of Bremen IFE's algorithm version 1.61 ( hereafter IFE), and the official ESA offline algorithm ( hereafter OL) versions 2.4 and 2.5. The ozone profiles were compared to a suite of correlative measurements from ground-based lidar and microwave, sondes, SAGE II and SAGE III (Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment). To correct for the expected Envisat pointing errors, which have not been corrected implicitly in either of the algorithms, we applied a constant altitude shift of -1.5 km to the SCIA-MACHY ozone profiles. The IFE ozone profile data between 16 and 40 km are biased low by 3-6%. The average difference profiles have a typical standard deviation of 10% between 20 and 35 km. We show that more than 20% of the SCIAMACHY official ESA offline (OL) ozone profiles version 2.4 and 2.5 have unrealistic ozone values, most of these are north of 15 degrees S. The remaining OL profiles compare well to correlative instruments above 24 km. Between 20 and 24 km, they underestimate ozone by 15 +/- 5%.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 209
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Bovensmann H, 1999, J ATMOS SCI, V56, P127, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0127:SMOAMM>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]  
BRACHER A, 2005, IN PRESS ADV SPACE R, P15305
[4]  
BRINKSMA EJ, 2004, ESA, P15305
[5]   SAGE-II INVERSION ALGORITHM [J].
CHU, WP ;
MCCORMICK, MP ;
LENOBLE, J ;
BROGNIEZ, C ;
PRUVOST, P .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1989, 94 (D6) :8339-8351
[6]   ERROR ANALYSIS FOR THE GROUND-BASED MICROWAVE OZONE MEASUREMENTS DURING STOIC [J].
CONNOR, BJ ;
PARRISH, A ;
TSOU, JJ ;
MCCORMICK, MP .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1995, 100 (D5) :9283-9291
[7]   VALIDATION OF SAGE-II OZONE MEASUREMENTS [J].
CUNNOLD, DM ;
CHU, WP ;
BARNES, RA ;
MCCORMICK, MP ;
VEIGA, RE .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1989, 94 (D6) :8447-8460
[8]  
DECLERCQ C, 2004, ESA, P15305
[9]   O3 profiles retrieved from limb scatter measurements:: Theory [J].
Flittner, DE ;
Bhartia, PK ;
Herman, BM .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (17) :2601-2604
[10]  
KAISER J, 2001, THESIS U BREMEN GERM