Soybean photoperiod-sensitivity loci respond differentially to light quality

被引:83
作者
Cober, ER
Tanner, JW
Voldeng, HD
机构
[1] AGR & AGRI FOOD CANADA,PLANT RES CTR,OTTAWA,ON K1A 0C6,CANADA
[2] UNIV GUELPH,DEPT CROP SCI,GUELPH,ON N1G 2W1,CANADA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600030014x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Soybean [Glycine mar (L.) Merr.] genotypes have been identified that show differential sensitivity to light quality. The use of different lamp types emitting light of different quality changed flowering responses to long days. The objective of this study was to investigate the flowering response of three photoperiod-sensitivity loci to long days of various light qualities. 'Harosoy' near-isogenic lines were grown under 20-h-long days of different light qualities, as measured by the bichromatic ratio of red to far-red quanta (R:FR), and under light quality gradients. Generally, the photoperiodic response was greater, i.e., later flowering, with decreased R:FR. The E(1) allele was most sensitive to light quality and required an R:FR approximating that of natural daylight for response to long days. The E(3) allele was the least sensitive, and the E(4) allele showed intermediate sensitivity to light quality. The earliest-flowering near-isogenic line (e(1) e(3) e(4)), previously found to be insensitive to long day length, showed sensitivity to long days of low R:FR light. Long days of high R:FR light were not effective in delaying flowering for some genotypes. Sensing the R:FR ratio is the function of phytochrome in light-grown plants. The three loci studied in this work responded differentially to changes in R:FR, suggesting either a close relationship between soybean E alleles and phytochrome or the possibility that some photoperiod-sensitivity loci are part of the phytochrome family of genes.
引用
收藏
页码:606 / 610
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   LIGHT QUALITY AND VERNALIZATION INTERACT IN CONTROLLING LATE FLOWERING ARABIDOPSIS ECOTYPES AND MUTANTS [J].
BAGNALL, DJ .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1993, 71 (01) :75-83
[2]  
Bernard R. L., 1991, Soybean Genetics Newsletter, V18, P27
[3]   2 MAJOR GENES FOR TIME OF FLOWERING AND MATURITY IN SOYBEANS [J].
BERNARD, RL .
CROP SCIENCE, 1971, 11 (02) :242-+
[4]  
BERNARD RL, 1973, AGRON MONOGR, V16, P177
[5]  
Bruzzell RI., 1980, SOYBEAN GENET NEWSL, V7, P26, DOI DOI 10.1093/JHERED/ESP113
[6]  
Buzzell R. I., 1975, SOYBEAN GENET NEWSL, V2, P47
[7]   INHERITANCE OF A SOYBEAN FLOWERING RESPONSE TO FLUORESCENT-DAYLENGTH CONDITIONS [J].
BUZZELL, RI .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND CYTOLOGY, 1971, 13 (04) :703-&
[8]   Genetic control of photoperiod response in early-maturing, near-isogenic soybean lines [J].
Cober, ER ;
Tanner, JW ;
Voldeng, HD .
CROP SCIENCE, 1996, 36 (03) :601-605
[9]   GENETIC-REGULATION OF DEVELOPMENT IN SORGHUM-BICOLOR .7. SHOOT GROWTH, TILLERING, FLOWERING, GIBBERELLIN BIOSYNTHESIS, AND PHYTOCHROME LEVELS ARE DIFFERENTIALLY AFFECTED BY DOSAGE OF THE MA(3)(R) ALLELE [J].
FOSTER, KR ;
MILLER, FR ;
CHILDS, KL ;
MORGAN, PW .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 105 (03) :941-948
[10]  
FRIEND D. J. C. et al., 1961, Canadian Journal of Plant Science, V41, P418