Water diffusion and exchange as they influence contrast enhancement

被引:225
作者
Donahue, KM
Weisskoff, RM
Burstein, D
机构
[1] Biophysics Research Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226
[2] Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH-NMR Center, Charlestown, MA 02129
[3] Department of Radiology, Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
[4] Harvard-MIT Div. Hlth. Sci. Technol., Cambridge
[5] Harvard Medical School, Boston
来源
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING | 1997年 / 7卷 / 01期
关键词
water diffusion; exchange; contrast agents; perfusion; relaxation;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.1880070114
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal is rarely a direct measure of contrast concentration; rather it depends on the effect that the contrast agent has on the tissue water magnetization. To correctly interpret such studies, an understanding of the effects of water movement on the magnetic resonance (MR) signal is critical. In this review, we discuss how water diffusion within biological compartments and water exchange between these compartments affect MR signal enhancement and therefore our ability to extract physiologic information. The two primary ways by which contrast agents affect water magnetization are discussed: (1) direct relaxivity and (2) indirect susceptibility effects. For relaxivity agents, for which T1 effects usually dominate, the theory of relaxation enhancement is presented, along with a review of the relevant physiologic time constants for water movement affecting this relaxation enhancement. Experimental issues that impact accurate measurement of the relaxation enhancement are discussed. Finally, the impact of these effects on extracting physiologic information is presented. Susceptibility effects depend on the size and shape of the contrast agent, the size and shape of the compartment in which it resides, as web as the characteristics of the water movement through the resulting magnetic field inhomogeneity. Therefore, modeling of this effect is complex and is the subject of active study. However, since susceptibility effects can be much stronger than relaxivity effects in certain situations, they may be useful even without full quantitation.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 110
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   WATER DIFFUSION PERMEABILITY OF HUMAN ERYTHROCYTES STUDIES BY A PULSED GRADIENT NMR TECHNIQUE [J].
ANDRASKO, J .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1976, 428 (02) :304-311
[2]   1ST-PASS CARDIAC PERFUSION - EVALUATION WITH ULTRAFAST MR IMAGING [J].
ATKINSON, DJ ;
BURSTEIN, D ;
EDELMAN, RR .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (03) :757-762
[3]   THEORY OF CONTRAST AGENTS IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING - COUPLING OF SPIN RELAXATION AND TRANSPORT [J].
BAUER, WR ;
SCHULTEN, K .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1992, 26 (01) :16-39
[4]  
BIZZI A, 1993, AM J NEURORADIOL, V14, P1347
[5]   MR CONTRAST DUE TO INTRAVASCULAR MAGNETIC-SUSCEPTIBILITY PERTURBATIONS [J].
BOXERMAN, JL ;
HAMBERG, LM ;
ROSEN, BR ;
WEISSKOFF, RM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 34 (04) :555-566
[6]   USE OF GD-DTPA AND FAST GRADIENT-ECHO AND SPIN-ECHO MR IMAGING TO DEMONSTRATE RENAL-FUNCTION IN THE RABBIT [J].
CARVLIN, MJ ;
ARGER, PH ;
KUNDEL, HL ;
AXEL, L ;
DOUGHERTY, L ;
KASSAB, EA ;
MOORE, B .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (03) :705-711
[7]   MR DIFFUSION IMAGING OF THE HUMAN BRAIN [J].
CHIEN, D ;
BUXTON, RB ;
KWONG, KK ;
BRADY, TJ ;
ROSEN, BR .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1990, 14 (04) :514-520
[8]  
CHU SCK, 1990, MAGN RESON MED, V13, P239, DOI 10.1002/mrm.1910130207
[9]   WATER DIFFUSION PERMEABILITY OF ERYTHROCYTES USING AN NMR TECHNIQUE [J].
CONLON, T ;
OUTHRED, R .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1972, 288 (02) :354-&
[10]   BONE-MARROW PERFUSION EVALUATED WITH GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED DYNAMIC FAST MR IMAGING IN A DOG-MODEL [J].
COVA, M ;
KANG, YS ;
TSUKAMOTO, H ;
JONES, LC ;
MCVEIGH, E ;
NEFF, BL ;
HEROLD, CJ ;
SCOTT, WW ;
HUNGERFORD, DS ;
ZERHOUNI, EA .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 179 (02) :535-539