Development of acute exposure guideline levels for airborne exposures to hazardous substances

被引:30
作者
Krewski, D [1 ]
Bakshi, K
Garrett, R
Falke, E
Rusch, G
Gaylor, D
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] CNR, Washington, DC 20418 USA
[3] US EPA, Washington, DC 20460 USA
[4] Honeywell Int Inc, Morristown, NJ USA
[5] Sci Int Inc, Little Rock, AR USA
关键词
acute exposures; health effects; airborne contaminants; exposure guideline levels; hazardous substances;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2003.11.009
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Hazardous substances can be released into the atmosphere due to industrial and transportation accidents, fires, tornadoes, earthquakes, and terrorists, thereby exposing workers and the nearby public to potential adverse health effects. Various enforceable guidelines have been set by regulatory agencies for worker and ambient air quality. However, these exposure levels generally are not applicable to rare lifetime acute exposures, which possibly could occur at high concentrations. Acute exposure guideline levels (AEGLs) provide estimates of concentrations for airborne exposures for an array of short durations that possibly could cause mild (AEGL-1), severe, irreversible, potentially disabling adverse health effects (AEGL-2), or life threatening effects (AEGL-3). These levels can be useful for emergency responders and planners in reducing or eliminating potential risks to the publics Procedures and methodologies for deriving AEGLs are reviewed in this paper that have been developed in the United States, with direct input from international representatives of OECD member-countries, by the National Advisory Committee for Acute Exposure Guidelines for Hazardous Substances and reviewed by the National Research Council. Techniques are discussed for the extrapolation of effects across different exposure durations. AEGLs provide a viable approach for assisting in the prevention, planning, and response to acute airborne exposures to toxic agents. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 201
页数:18
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY .2. COMPARISON OF GENERIC BENCHMARK DOSE ESTIMATES WITH NO OBSERVED ADVERSE EFFECT LEVELS [J].
ALLEN, BC ;
KAVLOCK, RJ ;
KIMMEL, CA ;
FAUSTMAN, EM .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 23 (04) :487-495
[2]  
Ashford N., 1998, Chemical exposures: low levels and high stakes
[3]   Low-level chemical sensitivity: implications for research and social policy [J].
Ashford, NA .
TOXICOLOGY AND INDUSTRIAL HEALTH, 1999, 15 (3-4) :421-427
[4]   Noncancer risk assessment: A probabilistic alternative to current practice [J].
Baird, SJS ;
Cohen, JT ;
Graham, JD ;
Shlyakhter, AI ;
Evans, JS .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1996, 2 (01) :79-102
[5]   REFERENCE DOSE (RFD) - DESCRIPTION AND USE IN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENTS [J].
BARNES, DG ;
DOURSON, M .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 8 (04) :471-486
[6]  
Brown N A, 1983, Clin Obstet Gynecol, V26, P467, DOI 10.1097/00003081-198306000-00028
[7]   UNCERTAINTY FACTORS AND INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIATION [J].
CALABRESE, EJ .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 5 (02) :190-196
[8]   The single exposure carcinogen database: Assessing the circumstances under which a single exposure to a carcinogen can cause cancer [J].
Calabrese, EJ ;
Blain, RB .
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 50 (02) :169-185
[9]   USING THE BIOLOGICAL 2-STAGE MODEL TO ASSESS RISK FROM SHORT-TERM EXPOSURES [J].
CHEN, JJ ;
KODELL, RL ;
GAYLOR, DW .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1988, 8 (02) :223-230
[10]  
CRUMP KS, 1984, RISK ANAL, V4, P163