The spatial precue effect for foveal detection/recognition tasks

被引:2
作者
Buckolz, E [1 ]
ODonnell, C [1 ]
Stevens, S [1 ]
McAuliffe, J [1 ]
机构
[1] LAKEHEAD UNIV,SCH PHYS EDUC,THUNDER BAY,ON P7B 5E1,CANADA
关键词
precue; reaction time; spatial; detection; recognition;
D O I
10.1080/001401397187883
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Forty university students participated in a spatial precue task that employed foveally delivered stimuli and precues (75% validity). The influence of three factors (1) precue interval duration (200 ms, 1000 ms), (2) the level of stimulus processing required (detection, recognition), and (3) instructions (usual, augmented), upon the spatial precue effect (indexed as the RT difference between valid and invalid precue conditions) were examined. The results obtained indicated that factors (I) and (2), but not (3), exerted a significant influence upon the size of the spatial precue effect. Specifically, when the level of stimulus processing is one of 'recognition', a reliable spatial precue effect can be expected, regardless of precue interval duration. However, if one simply has to 'detect' the presence of the imperative input, a spatial precue effect will emerge if the precue interval is long (i.e. 1000 ms) but not when it is comparatively short (200 ms). These findings indicate that the 'willingness' of subjects to allocate attention to a position in foveal visual space can be controlled with individuals being less inclined to do so when the level of stimulus processing is low (detection) and when the time allowed to use advance information is short.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 776
页数:16
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   INVERSION OF MOLECULAR-SCATTERING DATA [J].
BUCK, U .
COMPUTER PHYSICS REPORTS, 1986, 5 (01) :1-58
[2]   THE INFLUENCE OF ATTENTION AND RESPONSE FACTORS UPON THE SPATIAL PRECUE EFFECTS [J].
BUCKOLZ, E ;
HEWEY, D ;
KHAN, M ;
ALAIN, C .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 1994, 13 (06) :719-744
[3]   ACTIVATION INTERFERENCE ASSOCIATION FOR FINGER RESPONSES IN CHOICE-REACTION TIME TASKS [J].
BUCKOLZ, E ;
STAPLETON, P ;
ALAIN, C .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1994, 86 (01) :1-29
[4]   SPLITTING FOCAL ATTENTION [J].
CASTIELLO, U ;
UMILTA, C .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1992, 18 (03) :837-848
[5]   STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY AND AUTOMATIC RESPONSE ACTIVATION - EVIDENCE FROM PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES [J].
EIMER, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1995, 21 (04) :837-854
[6]   AGING AND SHIFTS OF VISUAL SPATIAL ATTENTION [J].
FOLK, CL ;
HOYER, WJ .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1992, 7 (03) :453-465
[7]   ON THE COST AND BENEFIT OF COST AND BENEFIT [J].
JONIDES, J ;
MACK, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1984, 96 (01) :29-44
[8]  
Loveless N E, 1974, Biol Psychol, V1, P303, DOI 10.1016/0301-0511(74)90005-2
[9]  
Posner M, 1975, INFORM PROCESSING CO
[10]   ATTENTION AND THE DETECTION OF SIGNALS [J].
POSNER, MI ;
SNYDER, CRR ;
DAVIDSON, BJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1980, 109 (02) :160-174