Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study

被引:5075
作者
Vaismoradi, Mojtaba [1 ,3 ]
Turunen, Hannele [2 ]
Bondas, Terese [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Swansea Univ, Coll Human & Hlth Sci, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Nursing Sci, Kuopio 70211, Finland
[3] Univ Nordland, Fac Profess Studies, Bodo, Norway
关键词
content analysis; nursing; qualitative descriptive research; thematic analysis; RESEARCH PROPOSALS;
D O I
10.1111/nhs.12048
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis are two commonly used approaches in data analysis of nursing research, but boundaries between the two have not been clearly specified. In other words, they are being used interchangeably and it seems difficult for the researcher to choose between them. In this respect, this paper describes and discusses the boundaries between qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis and presents implications to improve the consistency between the purpose of related studies and the method of data analyses. This is a discussion paper, comprising an analytical overview and discussion of the definitions, aims, philosophical background, data gathering, and analysis of content analysis and thematic analysis, and addressing their methodological subtleties. It is concluded that in spite of many similarities between the approaches, including cutting across data and searching for patterns and themes, their main difference lies in the opportunity for quantification of data. It means that measuring the frequency of different categories and themes is possible in content analysis with caution as a proxy for significance.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 405
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Research methods for clinical and Health Psychology, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781849209793
[2]  
[Anonymous], CONTENT ANAL INTRO I
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Qualitative Methods for Health Research
[6]  
Ballinger C., 2004, RES METHODS CLIN HLT, P102
[7]  
Bloor M., 2006, Keywords in Qualitative Methods, P129, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781849209403
[8]  
Bondas T., 2007, INT J QUALITATIVE ST, V2, P101
[9]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[10]  
Cavanagh S, 1997, Nurse Res, V4, P5, DOI 10.7748/nr.4.3.5.s2