Usefulness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

被引:2176
作者
Bestall, JC
Paul, EA
Garrod, R
Garnham, R
Jones, PW [1 ]
Wedzicha, JA
机构
[1] Univ London St Georges Hosp, Sch Med, Div Physiol Med, London SW17 0RE, England
[2] London Chest Hosp, St Bartholomews & Royal London Sch Med & Dent, Acad Dept Resp Med, London E2 9JX, England
关键词
MRC dyspnoea scale; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; dyspnoea;
D O I
10.1136/thx.54.7.581
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background-Methods of classifying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) depend largely upon spirometric measurements but disability is only weakly related to measurements of lung function. With the increased use of pulmonary rehabilitation, a need has been identified for a simple and standardised method of categorising disability in COPD. This study examined the validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale for this purpose. Methods-One hundred patients with COPD were recruited from an outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme. Assessments included the MRC dyspnoea scale, spirometric tests, blood gas tensions, a shuttle walking test, and Borg scores for perceived breathlessness before and after exercise. Health status was assessed using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ). The Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (EADL) score and Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) score were also measured. Results-Of the patients studied, 32 were classified as having MRC grade 3 dyspnoea, 34 MRC grade 4 dyspnoea, and 34 MRC grade 5 dyspnoea. Patients with MRC grades 1 and 2 dyspnoea were not included in the study. There was a significant association between MRC grade and shuttle distance, SGRQ and CRQ scores, mood state and EADL. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was not associated with MRC grade. Multiple logistic regression showed that the determinants of disability appeared to vary with the level of disability. Between MRC grades 3 and 4 the significant covariates were exercise performance, SGRQ and depression score, whilst between grades 4 and 5 exercise performance and age were the major determinants. Conclusions-The MRC dyspnoea scale is a simple and valid method of categorising patients with COPD in terms of their disability that could be used to complement FEV1 in the classification of COPD severity.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 586
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1960, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V2, P1665
[2]
BURDON JGW, 1982, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V126, P825
[3]
A MEASURE OF QUALITY-OF-LIFE FOR CLINICAL-TRIALS IN CHRONIC LUNG-DISEASE [J].
GUYATT, GH ;
BERMAN, LB ;
TOWNSEND, M ;
PUGSLEY, SO ;
CHAMBERS, LW .
THORAX, 1987, 42 (10) :773-778
[4]
A SELF-COMPLETE MEASURE OF HEALTH-STATUS FOR CHRONIC AIR-FLOW LIMITATION - THE ST-GEORGES RESPIRATORY QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
JONES, PW ;
QUIRK, FH ;
BAVEYSTOCK, CM ;
LITTLEJOHNS, P .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1992, 145 (06) :1321-1327
[5]
Quality of life changes in COPD patients treated with salmeterol [J].
Jones, PW ;
Bosh, TK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 155 (04) :1283-1289
[6]
EXERCISE CAPACITY AND VENTILATORY, CIRCULATORY, AND SYMPTOM LIMITATION WITH CHRONIC AIR-FLOW LIMITATION [J].
KILLIAN, KJ ;
LEBLANC, P ;
MARTIN, DH ;
SUMMERS, E ;
JONES, NL ;
CAMPBELL, EJM .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1992, 146 (04) :935-940
[7]
Lincoln N B, 1992, Disabil Rehabil, V14, P41
[8]
DYSPNEA, DISABILITY, AND DISTANCE WALKED - COMPARISON OF ESTIMATES OF EXERCISE PERFORMANCE IN RESPIRATORY-DISEASE [J].
MCGAVIN, CR ;
ARTVINLI, M ;
NAOE, H ;
MCHARDY, GJR .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1978, 2 (6132) :241-243
[9]
12-MINUTE WALKING TEST FOR ASSESSING DISABILITY IN CHRONIC-BRONCHITIS [J].
MCGAVIN, CR ;
GUPTA, SP ;
MCHARDY, GJR .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1976, 1 (6013) :822-823
[10]
EFFECT OF ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS ON EXERCISE TOLERANCE IN CHRONIC-BRONCHITIS [J].
MORGAN, AD ;
PECK, DF ;
BUCHANAN, DR ;
MCHARDY, GJR .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 286 (6360) :171-173