Portfolios in continuing medical education - effective and efficient?

被引:102
作者
Mathers, NJ [1 ]
Challis, MC [1 ]
Howe, AC [1 ]
Field, NJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, No Gen Hosp, Community Sci Ctr, Inst Gen Practice,Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield S5 7AU, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
continuing medical education; economy; methods; family practice; education; random allocation; cohort studies; Great Britain; mentors; questionnaires;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00407.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction A cross over comparison between 'traditional' continuing medical education (CME) activities and portfolio-based learning in general practice is described. Method Thirty-two volunteer general practitioners (GPs) were divided into two cohorts; each cohort spent six months following a 'traditional' route to postgraduate educational accreditation (PGEA) and six months following a portfolio-based learning route supported by three CME tutors. Outcome Measures These were the submission of a completed portfolio with evidence of the completion of learning cycles and participants reflections on the educational process. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation data were collected by questionnaire, semistructured interview, participant observation and review of completed portfolios. Results The themes identified by GPs as hopes for the portfolios were largely fulfilled and the anxieties generally confounded. The flexibility of the portfolio learning process was particularly important to the participants. The breadth of topics covered by the portfolios was extremely wide and comparison with the submissions for 'traditional' PGEA showed a much smaller spread of learning activities and fewer subjects of study. Effectiveness The use of the portfolios of critical incidents and the completion of learning cycles with application to practice provided evidence of the effectiveness of such learning. Efficiency The mean number of hours spent by GPs preparing the portfolios was 24.5 +/- 12 (SD) which was significantly more than the 15 hours of PGEA awarded. Conclusions This study demonstrates that a portfolio-based learning scheme can meet the needs of GPs relevant to their professional practice; it can give learners control over how, what and when they learn and encourage active and peer-supported learning; it can build personal and professional confidence and be thought both valid and reliable by participants. Learning outcomes cab. also be reliably assessed by PGEA within the context of an individually created learning plan.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 530
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   TOWARD A CONCEPTUALIZATION OF MENTORING [J].
ANDERSON, EM ;
SHANNON, AL .
JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 1988, 39 (01) :38-42
[2]  
Brookfield S.D., 1986, Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis ofPrinciples and Effective Practices
[3]   Portfolio-based learning: Continuing medical education for general practitioners - A mid-point evaluation [J].
Challis, M ;
Mathers, NJ ;
Howe, AC ;
Field, NJ .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1997, 31 (01) :22-26
[4]  
*ENGL NAT BOARD, 1991, PROF PORTF
[5]  
Glaser BG., 2008, Status Passage, V2
[6]  
Heron J., 1985, REFLECTION TURNING E
[7]  
HETHERINGTON C, 1985, J NATL ASS WOMEN DEA, V9, P12
[8]  
Kolb D., 1984, EXPT LEARNING
[9]  
Lincoln Y.S., 1985, HDB QUALITATIVE RES
[10]  
May K M, 1982, Nurs Outlook, V30, P22