Supply chain variability, organizational structure, and performance:: The moderating effect of demand unpredictability

被引:159
作者
Germain, Richard [1 ]
Claycomb, Cindy [2 ]
Droge, Comelia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Coll Business 154, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Wichita State Univ, Wichita, KS 67260 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
supply chains; performance; demand;
D O I
10.1016/j.jom.2007.10.002
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Supply chain process variability is the level of inconsistency, or volatility. in the flow of goods into, through, and out of a firm. The research investigates the links among organizational structure (formalization and integration), supply chain process variability, and performance as moderated by environmental uncertainty. We found that in a predictable demand environment, only formal control affects supply chain process variability, leading to improved financial results; but in an unpredictable demand environment, only cross-functional integration affects supply chain process variability, leading to improved financial performance. We also examined whether supply chain process variability is a complete or partial mediator of the relationship between organizational structure and performance, and found that: (1) in a predictable demand environment, supply chain process variability completely mediates the relationship between formal control and performance and (2) in an unpredictable demand environment, supply chain process variability partially mediates the relationship between integration and performance. Supply chain process variability has an inverse relationship with financial performance, regardless of the demand environment and organizational structure provides managers with the mechanisms to mitigate this variability's detrimental impact on financial performance. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 570
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Anand G, 2004, PROD OPER MANAG, V13, P369, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2004.tb00224.x
[2]   A THEORY OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT UNDERLYING THE DEMING MANAGEMENT METHOD [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
RUNGTUSANATHAM, M ;
SCHROEDER, RG .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (03) :472-509
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT J LOGISTICS MANA
[4]  
[Anonymous], J OPERATIONS MANAGEM
[5]  
Antony J., 1999, Integrated Manufacturing Systems, V10, P162, DOI 10.1108/09576069910264420
[6]   Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection [J].
Beckman, CM ;
Haunschild, PR ;
Phillips, DJ .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (03) :259-275
[7]   Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited [J].
Benner, MJ ;
Tushman, ML .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (02) :238-256
[8]   VARIABILITY IN ASSEMBLY AND COMPETING SYSTEMS - EFFECT ON PERFORMANCE AND RECOVERY [J].
BHATNAGAR, R ;
CHANDRA, P .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1994, 26 (05) :18-31
[9]   Knowledge as a contingency variable:: Do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure? [J].
Birkinshaw, J ;
Nobel, R ;
Ridderstråle, J .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (03) :274-289
[10]   THROUGHPUT ANALYSIS IN MANUFACTURING NETWORKS [J].
BITRAN, GR ;
SARKAR, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1994, 74 (03) :448-465