Limited relevance of the CHEK2 gene in hereditary breast cancer

被引:76
作者
Dufault, MR
Betz, B
Wappenschmidt, B
Hofmann, W
Bandick, K
Golla, A
Pietschmann, A
Nestle-Krämling, C
Rhiem, K
Hüttner, C
Von Lindern, C
Dall, P
Kiechle, M
Untch, M
Jonat, W
Meindl, A
Scherneck, S
Niederacher, D
Schmutzler, RK
Arnold, N
机构
[1] LMU, Dept Med Genet, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[2] Dept Gynaecol, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Bonn, Germany
[4] Max Delbruck Ctr Mol Med, Dept Tumor Genet, Berlin, Germany
[5] Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kiel, Germany
[6] Inst Epidemiol, Bonn, Germany
[7] Univ Klinikum Berlin, Charite Mitte, Berlin, Germany
[8] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[9] Univ Munich, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Munich, Germany
关键词
breast cancer; BRCA1; BRCA2; mutation analysis; CHEK2;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.20073
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To establish the importance of CHEK2 mutations for familial breast cancer incidence in the German population, we have screened all 14 of the coding exons in 516 families negative for mutations in both the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. We found 12 distinct variants in 30 unrelated patients (5.81%), including 5 that are novel and an additional 4 found for the first time in breast cancer. These aberrations were evaluated in 500 healthy women aged over 50 years and in the case of the 2 exon 10 mutations, 1100delC and 1214del4bp, in 1315 randomized healthy controls. According to our results, a statistically significant association for the exon 10 mutations was observed (p = 0.006). The prevalence of the 1100delC mutation in the German population, however, is significantly lower than those reported for other Caucasian populations both in familial breast cancer patients (1.6%) and controls (0.5%), and shows independent segregation with breast cancer in 2 of 4 families analyzed. The remaining 10 variants were more abundant in patients (21) compared to the controls (12) although the difference was not statistically significant. Interestingly, we found no increased breast cancer risk associated with the splice site mutation IVS2 + 1G --> A or the most common missense mutation I157T, which account for more than half (12/21) of the variants observed in patients. The low prevalence and penetrance of the exon 10 deletion mutations together with no, or an uncertain elevation in risk for other CHEK2 mutations suggests a limited relevance for CHEK2 mutations in familial breast cancer. Further evaluation of the unique variants observed in breast cancer is required to determine if they may play a role in a polygenic model of familial breast cancer. Nevertheless, it seems premature to include CHEK2 screening in genetic testing. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 325
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ALLINEN M, 2002, BRIT J CANCER, V85, P209
[2]   Evidence for further breast cancer susceptibility genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population-based study [J].
Antoniou, AC ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
McMullan, G ;
Day, NE ;
Ponder, BAJ ;
Easton, D .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 21 (01) :1-18
[3]   Chk2 kinase - A busy messenger [J].
Bartek, J ;
Falck, J ;
Lukas, J .
NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2001, 2 (12) :877-886
[4]   Heterozygous germ line hCHK2 mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome [J].
Bell, DW ;
Varley, JM ;
Szydlo, TE ;
Kang, DH ;
Wahrer, DCR ;
Shannon, KE ;
Lubratovich, M ;
Verselis, SJ ;
Isselbacher, KJ ;
Fraumeni, JF ;
Birch, JM ;
Li, FP ;
Garber, JE ;
Haber, DA .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5449) :2528-2531
[5]   Mutations in CHEK2 associated with prostate cancer risk [J].
Dong, XY ;
Wang, L ;
Taniguchi, K ;
Wang, XS ;
Cunningham, JM ;
McDonnell, SK ;
Qian, CP ;
Marks, AF ;
Slager, SL ;
Peterson, BJ ;
Smith, BI ;
Cheville, JC ;
Blute, ML ;
Jacobsen, SJ ;
Schaid, DJ ;
Tindall, DJ ;
Thibodeau, SN ;
Liu, WG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (02) :270-280
[6]   The ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis [J].
Falck, J ;
Mailand, N ;
Syljuåsen, RG ;
Bartek, J ;
Lukas, J .
NATURE, 2001, 410 (6830) :842-847
[7]   Functional impact of concomitant versus alternative defects in the Chk2-p53 tumour suppressor pathway [J].
Falck, J ;
Lukas, C ;
Protopopova, M ;
Lukas, J ;
Selivanova, G ;
Bartek, J .
ONCOGENE, 2001, 20 (39) :5503-5510
[8]   Comprehensive analysis of 989 patients with breast or ovarian cancer provides BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation profiles and frequencies for the German population [J].
Hofmann, W ;
Scherneck, S ;
Horn, D ;
Paepke, S ;
Grumann, M ;
Wappenschmidt, B ;
Kempe, A ;
Friedl, W ;
von der Groeben, C ;
Schmutzler, RK ;
Betz, B ;
Goecke, TO ;
Bodden-Heidrich, R ;
Beckmann, MW ;
Niederacher, D ;
Krueger, M ;
Schaefer, D ;
Jordan, J ;
von Minckwitz, G ;
Arnemann, J ;
Botz, J ;
Bartram, CR ;
Voigtländer, T ;
Bastert, G ;
Henningsen, P ;
Arnold, NK ;
Gross, E ;
Schlegelberger, B ;
Gerber, WD ;
Kiechle, M ;
Thamm, B ;
Kraus, H ;
Langanke, D ;
Voigt, T ;
Froster, UG ;
Brandau, O ;
Golla, A ;
Vodermeier, A ;
Nestle-Krämling, C ;
Meindl, A ;
Preisler-Adams, S ;
Dwornic-zak, B ;
Jebali, P ;
Jakisch, C ;
Horst, J ;
Eberhardt, E ;
Volm, T ;
Bochum, S ;
Tamulionyte, L ;
Grill, HJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 97 (04) :472-480
[9]  
Kilpivaara O, 2002, AM J HUM GENET, V71, P236
[10]   Structural and functional versatility of the FHA domain in DNA-damage signaling by the tumor suppressor kinase Chk2 [J].
Li, JJ ;
Williams, BL ;
Haire, LF ;
Goldberg, M ;
Walker, E ;
Durocher, D ;
Yaffe, MB ;
Jackson, SP ;
Smerdon, SJ .
MOLECULAR CELL, 2002, 9 (05) :1045-1054