What Have We Learned from Over 20 Years of Farmland Amenity Valuation Research in North America?

被引:80
作者
Bergstrom, John C. [1 ]
Ready, Richard C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS | 2009年 / 31卷 / 01期
关键词
WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; PUBLIC PREFERENCES; AGRICULTURAL LAND; OPEN SPACE; PRESERVATION; BENEFITS; VALUES; POLICY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9353.2008.01424.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
At least thirty studies have been conducted in North America over the last twenty-plus years that measure amenity values generated by farmland. A review of these studies provides evidence that estimated farmland amenity values are sensitive to increasing acreage, regional scarcity, alternative land use(s), public accessibility, productivity quality, human food plants, active farming, and intensive agriculture. Farmland amenity values are also sensitive to socio-demographic characteristics of beneficiaries. Inconclusive evidence is provided with respect to the effects of distance, agricultural land use, unique landscape features, property rights, and nonfarmland amenity substitutes. Implications of these results for future farmland amenity valuation research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 49
页数:29
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, MEASUREMENT ENV RESO
[2]   ESTIMATING AMENITY VALUES OF URBAN FRINGE FARMLAND - A CONTINGENT VALUATION APPROACH [J].
BEASLEY, SD ;
WORKMAN, WG ;
WILLIAMS, NA .
GROWTH AND CHANGE, 1986, 17 (04) :70-78
[3]  
Bergstrom J. C., 1985, Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, V17, P139
[4]   Using meta-analysis for benefits transfer: Theory and practice [J].
Bergstrom, John C. ;
Taylor, Laura O. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 60 (02) :351-360
[5]  
Bittner A., 2006, Moffat County land use and planning survey results
[6]  
Bowker J. M., 1994, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, V23, P218
[7]  
Champ PatriciaA., 2003, PRIMER NONMARKET VAL
[8]  
Duke J. M., 2004, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, V33, P209
[9]   Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process [J].
Duke, JM ;
Aull-Hyde, R .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 42 (1-2) :131-145
[10]  
DUKE JM, 2007, PRESERVING FARM FORE