The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria - What did they really say?

被引:1444
作者
Lance, CE [1 ]
Butts, MM
Michels, LC
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
cutoff criteria; citation analysis; goodness of fit; reliability; factor analysis;
D O I
10.1177/1094428105284919
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Everyone can recite methodological "urban legends" that were taught in graduate school, learned over the years through experience publishing, or perhaps just heard through the grapevine. In this article, the authors trace four widely cited and reported cutoff criteria to their (alleged) original sources to determine whether they really said what they are cited as having said about the cutoff criteria, and if not, what the original sources really said. The authors uncover partial truths in tracing the history of each cutoff criterion and in the end endorse a set of 12 specific guidelines for effective academic referencing provided by Harzing that, if adopted, should help prevent the further perpetuation of methodological urban legends.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 220
页数:19
相关论文
共 122 条