Therapeutic drug monitoring of amikacin in septic patients

被引:63
作者
Duszynska, Wieslawa [1 ]
Taccone, Fabio Silvio [2 ]
Hurkacz, Magdalena [3 ]
Kowalska-Krochmal, Beata [4 ]
Wiela-Hojenska, Anna [3 ]
Kuebler, Andrzej [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Med Univ, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, PL-50556 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Erasme Univ Hosp, Dept Intens Care, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Wroclaw Med Univ, Dept Clin Pharmacol, PL-50556 Wroclaw, Poland
[4] Wroclaw Med Univ, Dept Microbiol, PL-50368 Wroclaw, Poland
关键词
INTENSIVE-CARE; RISK-FACTORS; SEVERE SEPSIS; NEPHROTOXICITY; INFECTIONS; MORTALITY; SERUM; SHOCK;
D O I
10.1186/cc12844
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
100218 [急诊医学];
摘要
Introduction: Use of higher than standard doses of amikacin (AMK) has been proposed during sepsis, especially to treat less susceptible bacterial strains. However, few data are available on drug concentrations during prolonged therapy and on potential adverse events related to this strategy. Methods: Sixty-three critically ill patients who required AMK administration for the treatment of severe infection were included in this study. After a loading dose (LD, 18 to 30 mg/kg), the daily regimen was adapted using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of both peak (C-peak) and trough (C-min) concentrations. Target concentrations had to give a ratio of at least 8 between C-peak and the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the isolated pathogen. A C-min >5 mg/L was considered as potentially nephrotoxic. We recorded clinical and microbiological responses, the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) during therapy and ICU mortality. Results: The median AMK LD was 1500 (750 to 2400) mg, which resulted in a C-peak/MIC >= 8 in 40 (63%) patients. Increasing the dose in the 23 patients with a C-peak/MIC <8 resulted in optimal C-peak/MIC in 15 of these patients (79%). In 23 patients (37%), C-min was >5mg/L after the LD, notably in the presence of altered renal function at the onset of therapy, needing prolongation of drug administration. Overall, only 11 patients (17%) required no dose or interval adjustment during AMK therapy. Clinical cure (32/37 (86%) vs. 16/23 (70%), P = 0.18)) and microbiological eradication (29/35 (83%) vs. 14/23 (61%), P = 0.07) were higher in patients with an initial optimal C-peak/MIC than in the other patients. The proportion of patients with clinical cure significantly improved as the C-peak/MIC increased (P = 0.006). Also, increased time to optimal C-peak was associated with worse microbiological and clinical results. AKI was identified in 15 patients (24%) during AMK therapy; 12 of these patients already had altered renal function before drug administration. Survivors (n = 47) had similar initial C-peak/MIC ratios but lower C-min values compared to nonsurvivors. Conclusions: TDM resulted in adjustment of AMK therapy in most of our septic patients. Early achievement of an optimal C-peak/MIC ratio may have an impact on clinical and microbiological responses, but not on outcome. In patients with impaired renal function prior to treatment, AMK therapy may be associated with a further decline in renal function.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2006, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[2]
Drug treatment for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections [J].
Bassetti, Matteo ;
Righi, Elda ;
Esposito, Silvano ;
Petrosillo, Nicola ;
Nicolini, Laura .
FUTURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 3 (06) :649-660
[3]
CLINICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL EFFICACY, AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF AMIKACIN GIVEN ONCE DAILY FOR SEVERE INFECTIONS [J].
BEAUCAIRE, G ;
LEROY, O ;
BEUSCART, C ;
KARP, P ;
CHIDIAC, C ;
CAILLAUX, M .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1991, 27 :91-103
[4]
PREDICTION OF CREATININE CLEARANCE FROM SERUM CREATININE [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
GAULT, MH .
NEPHRON, 1976, 16 (01) :31-41
[5]
Optimizing Aminoglycoside Use [J].
Craig, William A. .
CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2011, 27 (01) :107-+
[6]
Impact of combination therapy with aminoglycosides on the outcome of ICU-acquired bacteraemias [J].
Delannoy, P. -Y. ;
Boussekey, N. ;
Devos, P. ;
Alfandari, S. ;
Turbelin, C. ;
Chiche, A. ;
Meybeck, A. ;
Georges, H. ;
Leroy, O. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 31 (09) :2293-2299
[7]
Dellinger RP, 2008, INTENS CARE MED, V34, P783, DOI [10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2, 10.1007/s00134-008-1040-9, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41]
[8]
GENTAMICIN THERAPY [J].
DEVINE, BJ .
DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY, 1974, 8 (11) :650-655
[9]
Drusano G.L., 2007, CLIN INFECT DIS, V45, P753, DOI DOI 10.1086/520991
[10]
EUCAST, Clinical Breakpoints